oh yeah right the sensitivity and stuff
but there isnt zoom or thermal resolution
also compatibility is probably su-34 exclusive
Zhuhai 2024
and it has to be before that because how could they hand out a brochure otherwise
not really you can see that the seeker is angeled downwards especially on the right one
3 Likes
It being an export or not doesn’t matter one bit.
The thin ring around the seeker also doesn’t align with 38ML’s looks.
Same way
References the A-4 even though one isn’t seen in the companion video, or otherwise referenced anywhere else.
and again don’t forget;
3 Likes
there is just one slight difference the 38mt is already in the game
1 Like
So is the GPU-5/A? It’s the 30mm Gunpod the F-5E, F-20 & A-7 have access to.
1 Like
and how has that anything to do with the kh-38mt?
So I’m wondering, what will be the next avenue worth exploring in order to remove “the thorn” ?
It is also a “what if” Brochure store that did not see wide service.
1 Like
Proof of carriage of the -38MT, not the -38MTE on the airframes it is currently implemented on.
2 Likes
easy fix:
rename the kh38mt to kh38mte
Those are the same missiles, just like R-73 and R-73E.
German MiG is carrying missiles it shouldn’t have just because it can fit them both, since they’re the same thing.
none of the 9.12 / 9.13 migs should have r-27er and r-27et but the r-73 instead
3 Likes
The F-15E with its x30 GBU-53 load out would ruin A LOT of peoples days lmao.
I pray it comes soon
1 Like
Yeah, but much like Brimstone and Spear-3. They’ll need to come up with some form of Quantity mitigation for GRB, that doesnt restrict them in other gamemodes.
Idk man… seems sus.
even if you really try to see a 38ml there the ring would be to big and the seeker isnt pointing straight but downwards
38ml:
comparison of that missile to the 38mt mockup shown at marks:
4 Likes
crazy how a goddamn refraction its really a difference maker on an extremely low quality pic
So it’s a mockup suspended on that plane and not an actual missile.