The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

i think RU strategy is
they are advertising it to china
China buy RU = more money
more money = more development on missiles
missiles done = finally IR ordinance
profit and sucess

its a comparison to similar situations.

Your whole statement just is useless and untrue. its nothing fair about it or sth that needs to be fullfilled

My guy came with receipts haha.

Here you need this;

Spoiler

4 Likes

oh hey gun job since u are here can u check the above

If they were really that desperate to ask for funding for an IR seeker, they would probably give out information on what they’re wanting to build and with what performance, to entice supporters.
Seeing how vaguely mentioned the IR part is, I think it’s already incorporated to the missile.

Look where the circle is and the top bar or whatever it is. You can see exactly where the circle is.

1 Like

im pretty sure that part wont be on the brochure

So first give me your money and only then I’ll tell you about the important thing.
I don’t think that’s how funding works.

2 Likes

there is absolutely nothing there man that’s straight up just cope if you ask me specially because there is setoffs on the bottom and top of the missile wich start where the rail on top starts wich on the ML picture it dosent have and neither does the MT mockup

In some cases in teh past it has actually, the advertise it being able to do X. and Y but can only do Y or X , usually ends up with both models thouhg unless one of them is just out and out better than the other.

I have nothing to cope with. I was against the Kh-38MT from the very beginning. It looks more like you’re coping.

they arent even KH38’s the setoffs and shape arent even that of a KH 38

image

2 Likes

image

1 Like

You know what a ridge or rim is, right? There is literally nothing there for the MT to be casting a dark shadow. Look closely at the one on the right, the seeker is actually angled downwards, and it’s not casting any reflections or shadows, which is more like the MT seeker would look like under sunlight.

But both could be something entirely different, or maybe both are the ML, the resolution, angle and exposure is so bad that at the end of the day nothing can be derived from it.

2 Likes

Nobody tell these guys that they often mount mockups to aircraft

7 Likes

you dont get what i said and its fine
the brochure is the advertising for the missiles
but that part where “we will tell you what it is” is not on the brochure itself, rather internal talks
basic stuff go on brochure
important stuff go private talk
when u give advertisement u dont go give ur money i tell u what it is after
RU sure go “here is the advertisement, if u interested further we tell u what it is”
make sense?

1 Like

this must be trolling

1 Like

I see that both are angled downwards.

1 Like

From your side. I think that I have nothing more to talk about with you.