Vehicle is outlined perfectly fine in that picture.
CAS in this game is pretty handheld so they get all the marks made by ground units shown.
Doesn’t take much effort to find them in a 400m diameter circle around their spawn.
lmao
there is literally no way to know if that is a wreck or not
or do you throw an agm at every heat signature you see and waste most of them on wrecks
5 Likes
I guess no one moves or gets marked, ever.
Everything in the F-16AJ is real and it is missing a lot of features.
so do you just like hover in place to watch them?
no the F-16 that was demonstrated to japan was toataly different from what we have ingame
F-16A under Japan is totally fake.
1 Like
For some reason gaijin gave CAS access to ground map, and then allowed them to click on it to set a target point so its even more braindead to find spawns or marked vehicles.
You can drive around at safe range watching things unfold.
Tiktok, Reddit, and Youtube… Do I need to say more? I have yet to see any content creators make claims that the Kh38 is fine.
In this forum, it’s also quite agreed upon. Let me ask you, did you ever ratio me or others with your opinion? In your view, the majority doesn’t think like that, so where’s all likes?
Lets stop pretending Mavericks act the same between different platforms. They don’t. A maverick on a F-16C is a lot better than a maverick on an A-10C.
What’s funny is that I regularly bring the Su39 into 12.0 matches and can get consistent kills with the Kh29TE
Ah yes, GBUs are so effective in the A-10 because you’ll be waiting a couple of business days for it to hit the target. The B+ is a high subsonic plane making launching mavs and gbus much more effective.
You still haven’t explained a good reason on why the Kh59, a hammer equivalent, is a good replacement for the KH38…
BRs can be adjusted accordingly when this happens which you seem to not be on board with. The SM3 will be good at 12.0-.3, the 34 will do well in 12.7 and the Su30 will still be great at 13.0.
Again, just because it’s a “poor” airframe, doesn’t give it an excuse to get broken agms that completely ruin top tier ground. Something you can’t wrap your head around.
2 Likes
no you cant, mav gimble limit is very bad
It’s funny how fast they can pinpoint the exact location of the spawn and just wait for something to pop in existence before shooting at them.
You can easily spawn camp them or turn around just to shoot a missile at a marked target.
its actually exactly like it. the F-16AJ is a nonexistent variant of an existing aircraft, and the Kh-38MT is a nonexistent variant of an existing missile (Kh-38ML exists)
both should be completely removed from the game
no you cant because if you are watching spawn you are flying towards it so you arent at 10km like you are claiming
a mav might not reach 10km if launched from that slow
Still, where’s the majority in that ?
I do need some evidence, as taking anecdotes as facts isn’t really wise.
Since when this forum constitutes the majority of players ?
It still has less missiles and worse A2A load out.
Because it isn’t a good replacement.
Because I’m not on board with changes that remove the reason vehicles actually were added to the game.
You do realize that repeating your opinion x times won’t just make it a fact, right ?
10km is the maximum theoretical range of AAs at which they struggle to hit strike drones, let alone anything else. Anything above 6-7km is safe unless you fall asleep in the meantime.
Marks don’t last for a millisecond.
oh so now you are moving the goal post
yeah and they arent particularly accurate, you still need to tell if what you see is a wreck or not
the KH-59 is a cruise missile and not an AGM (i mean it still kinda is but i hope you get the point)
it would have an even higher range than the KH-38 which is one of the biggest complaints that ppl have in here about the KH-38
the KH-59 also has a higher exlposive mass
Scout marks are pretty accurate.
and if you want to be even more accurate, you can have a buddy with a recon drone that is marking targets for you