If you have said info why not share it instead of complaining about the threads existence
9 Likes
Because it’s probably not declassified???
Funny how that works, if its classified why state you could find it, once again please stop making everything a sob story about how everyone hates russia especially when its a genuine effort to find information which this is
10 Likes
You’re not the brightest are you? Classified information can be found online, but not distributed. Hence the recent F-14 leak thanks to certain people…. Sheesh
Sob story? No.
Reality? Yes. Every day many posts come up claiming Russian bias, Russia op, etc.
Guess what? People think the Brit’s are bad, and I love them over Russian tanks. The fox still has yet to be nerfed either! lol talk about bias.
1 Like
Maybe im not, but end of the day whos the one here trying to say “its hate specifically directed at russia” i dont think its me
3 Likes
So I need to go link every post to prove this? Morvran is pretty anti Russian and he’s in here.
Also you mentioned the fox, it was literally nerfed this update
2 Likes
Well, we learned that the IR Hammers and Kh-38MT seekers aren’t supposed to have direct lock onto targets but are supposed to lock onto a target programmed; a lock functionality that could very well [potentially] make it worse than AGM-65s.
1 Like
I wouldn’t call a fix a nerf. It was grossly over preforming. Same with the F-15E on launch, then they fixed it.
A nerf is artificial.
A fix is real.
So if it was found these missiles in their current capacity in game did not do what they can currently do would that not be a fix as well
Yes. But do we have evidence to suggest so?
Source : trust me bro.
1 Like
Im yet to see any evidence of them actually being used
Controlled information is common.
But in either case at this point it’s opinion.
This is for the KH-38?
An opinion which is not anti any nation would you agree, since all evidence is being taken into account
Please stick to the topic.
And if you do have evidence about it being used and whatnot (as long as it’s not restricted in some way), then feel free to post it, as it just adds more fuel to the fire if you just mention you have a source/image and proceed not to post it
14 Likes
I don’t agree. The OP posted anywhere and everywhere he could about it. If it was just 1 place, the forums, I wouldn’t think much of it.
But the common post is anti Russian, which people really need to stop being. There is no reason to be anti any nation.
1 Like
I can only assume what I saw was restricted, so I don’t dare post it
Yes, all of those are to everyone’s knowledge mockups and not functional.
Here is an image of Eurofighter with IRIS-T and METEOR missiles from 2001:
Meteors first test fire was done in 2006, before then there was no proof of the missile even functioning. Despite that it had already sold thousands of missiles years before first test fire.
IRIS-T had it’s first test fire in 2003.
The missiles presence on a showroom floor tells you absolutely nothing on it’s practical functionality or even actual existence. For all we know the images you show might be completely empty plastic cases with a TV seeker at the front to make it look more appealing to potential buyers.
Edit:
I do want to clarify that i’m not saying that they aren’t capable of building it or even if they have built it or not. The only thing i personally know as of now is that there is no evidence that they ever did have a functional missile, that evidence might exist, but i haven’t seen it and that is what a vast majority of users in this thread is looking for.
And honestly, i actually personally don’t care either way. The only thing i’ve strived for in this thread so far is that everyone arguing should be on the same page of what evidence does or does not exist, after that everyone is completely free to have whatever opinion they want.
28 Likes