It allows every decision gaijin make to be called into question.
Every weapon they’ve refused for vehicles because “it was never used on that vehicle”
Every vehicle never added because it was only a mockup.
Everything.
They need to address this.
9 Likes
Especially as we can start asking him for the typhoon again 🤣
or or we give ARM missiles to everyone but russia that way its more balanced since russia has no need for them anyway
Then make one.
I already said I’d support you in it’s removal. If you care that much, make a thread to suggest it.
1 Like
I have no idea how those perform, if they are similar it’s fine as far as i am concerned.
I don’t what you wrote earlier, it’s just not what you said in the post i replied to.
theyre not really similar perfomance, but just way worser(Still better than AGM-65 btw).
like… its subsonic… against 2.2mach missile(KH38)
2 Likes
Blame the RU engineers that couldn’t make a solid FM at that time to save their lives. They’re the true reason you suffer in this game.
This is not my idea, Gaijin is balancing things with this in mind for years. Not everything has to have the same mobility, armor, firepower, etc. in order to be balanced against contemporaries.
If they did, then all vehicles would be a copy paste of each other with different skins applied.
1 Like
It’s only me, I’m the bias. They added it because I told them to.
that is a super hornet not the leagacy one
so unless we get the f/a-18E we wont get it
I don’t what you wrote earlier, it’s just not what you said in the post i replied to.
I told motorola I’d happily support the removal of the F-16AJ, as it shouldn’t be there and didn’t really exist. I do this because I’m not a hypocrite.
The comment was more about the consequences of not removing the fake kh-38MT and the pandoras box it opens up.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
Wouldnt go there if i were you.
1 Like
let me get the popcorn lol
Im out, last time i took such bait i had to take a long vacation from forums lmao.
People that have problems with 38MT as it might be fake are the ones that should be the OP of those threads, as fakes are clearly bothering them that much.
Don’t frame the pandora’s box opening on 38MT.
It’s clear that WT received it’s first fakes years ago and that trend continues to this day.
2 Likes
Well no, it wouldn’t have been better at all.
Gaijin (in recent times) refused to add weapons to vehicles because it never used them, or refused to add vehicles because they were only mockups. In rare cases when they did go against that policy, they explained why (e.g. yak-141), even if I don’t agree with their reasoning or logic.
And now we have this weapon that never left the mockup stage and far surpasses everything else in the same class.
This speaks to either negligence on Gaijin’s part, or a double-standard when adding things to some nations. If it’s negligence then they added it based upon nothing and the entire thing is made up and that got past their own internal systems. If it was willful adding it against their own policies then that needs to be addressed as well.
Pick your poison.
5 Likes
The thread is about finding more evidence of 38MT’s existence. OG post doesn’t reference “Russian bias” per se except maybe some dog whistles.
1 Like
Not a fan of the thread devolving into this, but I understand the frustration ppl have with how unreasonable the USSR mains are being about this too.
The thread is largely meant to find and discuss evidence of the missile being operationally real, and since tge soviet mains have not been able to find a single shred of evidence beyond what I originally brought up (the brochures/outdated webpages and the mockups), theyve instead decided to waste everyones time arguing off topic why russia deserves to keep a weapon that does not meet the games typical standards of proof for additions.
On one hand, its whats keeping this thread alive, on the other, its not at all what this threads about as mods have pointed out over and over.
It REALLY doesnt help that gaijin hasnt made any statements in the meantime though.
16 Likes
Can’t blame them nobody like double standard treatment.
2 Likes
dont get me wrong I would rather not have fake weapons in the game but if we arent gonna get any form of response from the devs I would prefer to show their hypocrisy when we ask for fake weapons that (actually have more evidence) then the KH38MTs for existing and they get denied
5 Likes