The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[Smugspite]

na Im making a joke there is no IR Brimstone its like the KH-38MT thats the joke lol

[Morvran]

The Eurofighter has no FnF AGM at all, not even a TV guided seeker like the KH-29

Therefore let’s give it the TYPHOON.

The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

Companies advertised stuff that isn’t fully developed yet all the time. If people sign up as customers then it gets put into full development and production, if they don’t it quietly dies. For example the Typhoon (ASRAAM with a HEAT warhead for use against tanks) got advertised at trade shows and then faded into obscurity when no one ordered it: [237902-14744339d65996f33537af46f0d4783e]

Here is a picture of an ASRAAM being fired

Here is a mockup of the Typhoon

[Kingtiez]

Interesting

[ARK_BOI]

Yeah that thing.

[Smugspite]

@MotorolaCRO

I guess asymmetrical balancing is hard to get around.

true true we should remove all armour from soviet tanks but its fine because they still have autoloaders that most top tier tanks dont have thats just asymmetrical balancing, ooo ooo I know lets also remove R-77 and R-77-1s and replace them with R-27ERs after all they are the best SARH it would just be asymmetrical balancing

[maguumo]

@Beeschurger

Thats insanely close for a top tier jet.

It is. At larger distances the angular adjustment to reaquire the SPAA will be smaller of course. I picked the worst case scenario.

@Beeschurger

What if it doesnt move perfectly perpendicular to the flight path? Thats factor outside of attacking plane control and thus relies on luck rather than skill.

Then the angular adjustment necessary to reacquire the SPAA will be smaller, making it easier for you to kill it.

@Beeschurger

Sorry, i dont. I cant be bothered with any sort of squadron activity since i moved to WT from WoT 8 years ago.

No worries, it’s just a good example how vehicles can perform when they’re using their full potential. The Typhoon vs Pantsir battle happens pretty much every match there (in the week that top tier is played), so people optimize it to hell and back.

[Smugspite]

hey it meets the criteria of weapons apparently, we got images of the main body being fired and we have a mock up (its more then the KH-38MT since the seeker is actually attached to the missile)

honestly we should try to get the devs to add it if all we need is a mock up and proof that only a variant of the weapon has been test fired and integrated

[Morvran]

Honestly. If they turn around and say KH38MT is fine with the current evidence and then deny the Typhoon. It shows their bias

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@SwingfireOP

Works for me.

If they can have fake shit, so can we.

So you admit this is what this thread is about ? The wrong nation got the fake stuff.

[Beeschurger]

@Smugspite

hey it meets the criteria of weapons apparently, we got images of the main body being fired and we have a mock up (its more then the KH-38MT since the seeker is actually attached to the missile)

honestly we should try to get the devs to add it if all we need is a mock up and proof that only a variant of the weapon has been test fired and integrated

Apparently not even that.

@Gunjob

Even if KH-38MT wasn’t progressed to production, it was atleast planned to be IR.

[Jεcka]

@Smugspite

hey it meets the criteria of weapons apparently, we got images of the main body being fired and we have a mock up (its more then the KH-38MT since the seeker is actually attached to the missile)

LaGS has also been test fired by a Gripen so it’s ready for addition, and it’s basically just a Kh-38ML but with a smaller warhead :>

[ARK_BOI]

Also AGM-179 can also see on F-18 too

Yet we still not see KH-38 on pictures like this

[Morvran]

I don’t even understand why AGM84 hasn’t been added to the F18s yet

[Jεcka]

@Ghost of TelAviv

So you admit this is what this thread is about ? The wrong nation got the fake stuff.

After days of seeing one side actively go out of their way to employ every single type of mental gymnastic and fallacy (not talking about you here) in order to defend their vehicles getting to enjoy a pretty much fake, but also obscenely OP weapon, I kinda get why some are just starting to go “okay, give us the same treatment”.

[Smugspite]

yeah I expected as much from a russian main to only take away that, you ignore the fact that we have been arguing about its existence and why it shouldnt be added but the moment we suggest that if this fake weapon isnt going to be removed the entire point of this thread was clearly just to add fake weapons to nato vics?

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@Jεcka

After days of seeing one side actively go out of their way to employ every single type of mental gymnastic and fallacy (not talking about you here) in order to defend their vehicles getting to enjoy a pretty much fake, but also obscenely OP weapon, I kinda get why some are just starting to go “okay, give us the same treatment”.

I agree, i just don’t like if they pretend it isn’t the case.

[Smugspite]

sadly that is a super hornet or at least im pretty sure

[ItsOnyy]

No, this thread highlights Gaijin’s own hypocrisy and standards (and lack thereof) when it comes to adding weapons. Most people here don’t care where this weapon is from.

[ARK_BOI]

So? no pictures of MT carry by aircraft too yet SU-25 SU-34/30 can have them
And super hornet still F-18

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@Smugspite

yeah I expected as much from a russian main to only take away that

Im not a russian main, i play russia though.

@Smugspite

the moment we suggest that if this fake weapon isnt going to be removed the entire point of this thread was clearly just to add fake weapons to nato vics?

Surely not for everybody, but a lot of the one nation players are just salty they added the fake stuff not to their nation i bet.