true true we should remove all armour from soviet tanks but its fine because they still have autoloaders that most top tier tanks dont have thats just asymmetrical balancing, ooo ooo I know lets also remove R-77 and R-77-1s and replace them with R-27ERs after all they are the best SARH it would just be asymmetrical balancing
1 Like
It is. At larger distances the angular adjustment to reaquire the SPAA will be smaller of course. I picked the worst case scenario.
Then the angular adjustment necessary to reacquire the SPAA will be smaller, making it easier for you to kill it.
No worries, it’s just a good example how vehicles can perform when they’re using their full potential. The Typhoon vs Pantsir battle happens pretty much every match there (in the week that top tier is played), so people optimize it to hell and back.
hey it meets the criteria of weapons apparently, we got images of the main body being fired and we have a mock up (its more then the KH-38MT since the seeker is actually attached to the missile)
honestly we should try to get the devs to add it if all we need is a mock up and proof that only a variant of the weapon has been test fired and integrated
8 Likes
Honestly. If they turn around and say KH38MT is fine with the current evidence and then deny the Typhoon. It shows their bias
7 Likes
So you admit this is what this thread is about ? The wrong nation got the fake stuff.
Apparently not even that.
1 Like
LaGS has also been test fired by a Gripen so it’s ready for addition, and it’s basically just a Kh-38ML but with a smaller warhead :>
2 Likes
Also AGM-179 can also see on F-18 too
Yet we still not see KH-38 on pictures like this
4 Likes
I don’t even understand why AGM84 hasn’t been added to the F18s yet
1 Like
After days of seeing one side actively go out of their way to employ every single type of mental gymnastic and fallacy (not talking about you here) in order to defend their vehicles getting to enjoy a pretty much fake, but also obscenely OP weapon, I kinda get why some are just starting to go “okay, give us the same treatment”.
7 Likes
yeah I expected as much from a russian main to only take away that, you ignore the fact that we have been arguing about its existence and why it shouldnt be added but the moment we suggest that if this fake weapon isnt going to be removed the entire point of this thread was clearly just to add fake weapons to nato vics?
1 Like
I agree, i just don’t like if they pretend it isn’t the case.
sadly that is a super hornet or at least im pretty sure
No, this thread highlights Gaijin’s own hypocrisy and standards (and lack thereof) when it comes to adding weapons. Most people here don’t care where this weapon is from.
1 Like
So? no pictures of MT carry by aircraft too yet SU-25 SU-34/30 can have them
And super hornet still F-18
Im not a russian main, i play russia though.
Surely not for everybody, but a lot of the one nation players are just salty they added the fake stuff not to their nation i bet.
oh but you see that is a western jet and because there is a picture of it gaijin will also use that as an excuse to say it cant come
1 Like
Good job pointing out you still have no idea what that is, but that’s fine as long as you aren’t in charge of balancing anything.
The point is. The KH38MT raises major questions of balance. Period.
Especially when similar performance weapons like AGM-84 and Brimstone 2 have not been added.
Perticularly with the state of top tier SPAA.
Now it looks to be a paper weapon. It raises even more questions and opens the door for everyone else to get paper weapons.
If either the paper weapons or real weapons get denied, then it raises serious questions
6 Likes
Dude, you’re still pretending Russia having an obscenely OP weapon cus their platforms can’t 1v1 the EFT & Rafale is “balance”?
I thought you’d grow up enough to see your idea of balance is just as aloof as of the peeps who think M1 should be 10.3, but that doesn’t appear to be the case at all.
10 Likes