its a list of the gathered information that can be found, all leading only to statements that its an idea etc.
You are still moving goal posts here and not doing anything for the topic.
Do you have prove of the missle existing functionaly?
If yes provide it, besides that anything you realy state is useless. We dont need to prove its non existence.
What the OP provided was prove that leads to the topic of the missle potentialy not being real.
All of you russian fanboys were not able to prove the opposite and are only fighting the matter with topics that irrelevant and are grasping for straws
So wait. You’re here not to prove/disprove the existence of the missile.
You came here just to attack the OP for simplifying the conclusion?
So to start a fight or something?
This topic is initially misleading precisely because of the list of “proofs of non-existence”. Which is a list of incorrectly stated facts. As a result, it seems that the author is neutral, he allegedly provided 1 (one) proof of existence and a whole list of proofs of non-existence. There are more proofs of non-existence, so the missile should be removed. This is a manipulation of facts.
Mythic wrote it as “proof of non existence”, which i don’t totally agree with, as it should be “lack of proof for its existence”, but that’s a detail really
However none of this matters, because as Necronomica said earlier, non-existence can’t be proven. This means the missile should be removed from the game until its existence can be proven. In soon-to-be 4000 messages, nobody was able to prove that the missile indeed exists…
That statement is absolutely not true. You can prove non-existence in these fields but its standardly much harder so it’s impractical. I can prove for example that TV-8 tank never existed or other concepts which never went to prototype but it must be well documented.