You have a nerve to come here, skip 3600 messages and come up with a set of complete nonsense takes.
Unspecified seeker + unspecified missile type = general mockup, hence not an evidence of it existence.
Same as a plastic model not being a proof of anime girls existing.
If it was there - they would use it. We haven’t even seen a single photo of it attached to anything. not even for testing.
As well as it’s not being evidence for it’s existence.
No one is saying that. That’s just a common sense conclusion.
Because there’s not a single evidence of its existence.
And that’s what ru military usually does, adding up to doubts.
This missile isn’t real.
And here how it’s happened:
RMoD - We need a modular missile, here’s what we want it being able to do
Manufacturer - Oh hell yea, your money - our pleasure, we can do that.
(turns out they can’t and they actually knew it before signing up a contract)
Manufacturer - Oh well, dear MoD, at least ML variant is good!!!
(other variants are forgotten about, because if you tell about your fails - you lose)
the ML is being used or tested is not prove of the MT.
There is more to a missle then its body, The seeker is an important part that needs to be functioning and be integrated
Well, you should also know that the game doesnt treat ships and tanks in the same ways, the “all aspect” range of the seekers is only agaisnt ships not tanks, you cant get a track at a tanks at 20km
Those “speedboats” were Elco class torpedo boats. They’re 25 meters long. Try locking on a tank and see at what range you can get it to switch from POINT to TRACK. It’ll be ~13 km. It’s been that way forever.
But it is not proof of non-existence. That is, the author of the topic is misleading.
But it is not proof of non-existence. That is, the author of the topic is misleading.
That is, the author of the topic is misleading.
The author of the topic collected a bunch of speculations and incorrect interpretations, which for some reason suddenly became “evidence of non-existence”.
I am not discussing evidence of existence. I am talking about evidence of “non-existence” that the author allegedly provided. And which is in fact disinformation.
Scrolling back i saw u were already in this thread, typical of you to go back to that, you need to prove its existence first.
You always resulting to your not proof of non existence is wrong cause it doesnt apply.
Seriously grasping at straws to justify a gamebreaking weapon
I mean with IOG you launch at 20km and with in 5 seconds the missile is at that 13km mark and is already tracking by IR the ammount of russian mains that keep trying to tell me but bro you can just move, when from 20km you have 5 whole seconds before its tracking
For the 100th time already, non existence can’t be proven.
I could say Chile developped a rainbow colored missile that goes underground and you couldn’t prove it does not exist. That’s why something is considered “non existent” until its existence is proven.
All the author provided was simply mentions of the KH38 available in open source, non of which prove the missile exists.
As such, and as long as the missile’s exitence can’t be proven, it should be removed from the game
Is it though ? That thing has been ruining top tier for a year
If you can’t prove non-existence, then why does the author mislead by providing a long list of supposed proofs? Which are actually incorrectly interpreted facts.
