Either gaijin devs made a potentially mistaken assumption of its existence solely based on a brochure and a mockup, or they have evidence it exists.
Thats kind of the whole reason why I’ve asked for them to provide evidence it does in fact exist and belongs in-game.
It doess matter, the missile does exist and was used.
It’s not they saw a drawing in a comic book and thought that missile looks cool, let’s add it.
And since they use IR seekers for other missiles, it’s more than plausible that they have a variant of this one too.
It’s not the same as what you are trying to do with your post.
1 Like
do you have real evidence or just theories with no evidence to back them up with?
1 Like
ARK_BOI
April 17, 2025, 12:54pm
3099
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Its funny you say that cuz atm that seems to be just about exactly what happened (drawings in a brochure, not a comic book, but close enough)
1 Like
There is even a video somewhere, where a KH38 (i don’t think they say which one) was used.
You will never get proof from gaijin lmao
so it doesn’t even say it was a kh38mt and it could have been anything else
So you are saying KH38 is not real ?
were talking about kh38mt specifically
Theres multiple videos and they’re all Kh-38ML’s. They cant be posted here tho due to forum rules.
It was KH38, whatever variant. So yes, the KH38 does exist.
Now does the IR seeker ? Maybe or maybe not.
Dont make claims u cant prove.
If KH 38MT was used show us clearly
1 Like
Nobody has said the Kh-38ML doesnt exist…
the topic isn’t “all kh-38 does not exist” but kh-38mt
6 Likes
Existence of one thing dowsnr prove for another variant.
Between kh29 and lmur and the kh 38mt would be worlds apart in capsbility
ARK_BOI
April 17, 2025, 12:58pm
3113
if people said KH-38 in here the probably mean MT version since the topic name specifically said
“KH-38MT” already
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
ARK_BOI
April 17, 2025, 1:00pm
3119
Yeah when I mention KH-38 here sometimes I’m too lazy to put MT behind it too since topic name it about MT do i need to put MT behind in everytime?
Things have been and continue to be offered for export before they even exist.
As i compared here:
Yes, all of those are to everyone’s knowledge mockups and not functional.
Here is an image of Eurofighter with IRIS-T and METEOR missiles from 2001:
[image]
Meteors first test fire was done in 2006, before then there was no proof of the missile even functioning. Despite that it had already sold thousands of missiles years before first test fire.
IRIS-T had it’s first test fire in 2003.
The missiles presence on a showroom floor tells you absolute…
What we see is some unknown seeker of unknown functionality on a mockup missile. There has so far been no proof provided that a IR seeker has been implemented into a functional KH-38 and test fired.
10 Likes