If thats your opinion, why even waste all of our time arguing here?
Because I am also curious about the seeker?
Welp, this is unfortunate
So you concede that there is no concrete evidence of the missiles existence beyond the mockup stage currently available, and have instead decided to waste all our time by demanding I provide something that cannot possibly be provided (evidence of non-existence) instead of just trying to find what can be provided and has been requested (evidence of existence).
Cool.
1 Like
They will need to. It has become ro big of a matter
KH-38MT is as real as the Ho-Ri, only a mockup
not an actually produced thing
source? Belkan Ministry of Skill Issue
2 Likes
Hey man, I just pointed out you set yourself up to proving a negative. Sorry if I offended you in any way
He didnt. Becsuse thats not a thing in the first place in this case
2 Likes
Not how that works at all
The burden of proof lies on the one trying to prove the existence of something.
As Necronomica pointed earlier, proving non-existence is hard and in some cases impossible.
Also, it opens the door for so much worst things in the future. Everyone running around with a model could claim they made something that works, and it could be added in the game on the basis that “you can’t prove it doesn’t exist”
1 Like
True, but that doesn’t really strengthen your case. It results in the same as there is no such thing as evidence of absence as you cannot prove non-existence.
Which AGAIN is why it’s the default and not something you can prove. It’s something we fall to because there is no other choice.
That is perfectly reasonable as you are making a statement within a premise. a statement can hold true within a premise but be false outside of it.
So with premise A then statement B holds true, but without premise A then statement B wouldn’t logically hold.
As previously recommended in this thread by me:
2 Likes
gaijin: cant prove a IR guided bomb can track tanks, despite community showing proof it can
also gaijin: Kh-38MT exists, and lets make ASM’s track tanks for some funny reason
Source: Belkan Ministry of Skill Issue (im just goofing here pls dont smite)
2 Likes
Its annoying to have to go over the same stupid argument multiple times a day with multiple different people. You can’t set yourself up to prove a negative, since its impossible to do in the first place, which is why I requested evidence of a positive in the first place.
Im not wasting any more time on this, if you cant figure it out, thats your own problem.
1 Like
2796 messages and no undeniable evidence yet
Rather telling
8 Likes
the Kh-38MT came to us in a dream
1 Like
*Nightmare lol
1 Like
whats the difference xD it’s not real either way
1 Like
quite an overwhelming majority is in favor of removing it too (basically 5 out of 6 people who answered the poll).
That poll has quite a big amount of voters as well compared to the more casual ones.
2 Likes
russian mains aint recovering from this one if it does get removed
1 Like
MFW still about as much proof of it being real as the O-I tank after this long
i’m not too concerned for them tbh
The laser one will still be OP enough