Nah i dont care if its heat or not. Dual mode IR-Laser guidence would be good
I would like to see proxy fuze warhead tho
2 Likes
It would be better than Vikhirs in anti heli gameplay, would prob be a pretty high sp cost
The developer doesn’t have to prove anything to you, and neither does the manufacturer.
3 Likes
Close range probably. Past 4km are crap on helis but when its something like A10C
If there was something like ground vehicle that use it would be cool with proxy fuzes
FnF atgm for helis yes, but wasnt the best one. Vikhers still outperformed then since u were able to spam them so much and they got a way longer range.
And generaly planes perform better then helis with fnf stuff
1 Like
someones salty for getting called out
4 Likes
But he is correct tho…
1 Like
added AS mig 29 and F-16 CANNON FODDER
i literaly said as, meaning sth follows
Pretty much Vikhirs only had range over PARS. You could equally spam both, but you could run away with the UHT
But you are making an assumption in thinking it has been produced
who’s to say it was not produced and hence there are no reports of its testing / pictures of its integration.
Atleast the Vikher are faster, have more range and also an Proxy Fuze
until proven otherwise it does not exist.
And war thunder does proud itself as a comprehensive simulator with getting as near to realism as possible in such a game. They removed fake tanks and vehicles specialy for this reason.
Exactly for this reason they often name sources in bug fixes as well.
They ask for primary sources or multiple secondary sources for changes.
In situations like this yes they need to answer and follow their own guidelines.
Gajin had russian favouritsm accusations more then once, things like this will hurt them
12 Likes
I’d still rather take FnF, as I can get out of spaa range before they can hit me.
It is a pretty new weapon, so they will likely not release any docs related to it
Is he tho?
The reason he is defending it in this way is based on assumptions from very limited evidence arriving on the conclusion of its existence.
in that case remove it from the game until proven otherwise,
it likely might be added completly wrong and doesnt actualy have the ability to track vehicles for all we know
The only time I’ve seen this be true is with the US team. As they pay the most into premiums. They get preferable brs for the premiums, and have superb tanks that just haven’t moved in years!
Take a gander
So remove the abrams then too? The Type 90? Etc etc
Say bye bye to a lot of German tanks too.
Exactly the best info on seekerhead operation (the brochure) does not suggest an ability to track vehicles
they have more proven stuff and functionality then this missle
they rightfully have been removed already for this reason