The jagdtiger is way too op for 6.7

Exactly.

Jagdtiger accelerates slow, moves slow, turns slow, reverses slow, adjusts slow, aims slow, and is the size of a barn…

But oh, God forbids it’s actually capable of withstanding shots frontally on a downtier. It must be uptiered so it’s outclassed even in terms of armor and firepower by even more opponents that are even faster and even more agile simultaneously…

3 Likes

I would say the reverse is more than adequate for what type of vehicle it is, but yes, all other aspects of its mobility are garbage, and so is the targeting speed.

And hes making absolute slop of a content nowadays.

Brings one vehicle lineup, shoots first enemy

GUYS THIS TANK IS INSANE

No one denies he is good player.

But his opinions are tailored to the content he makes, which is slop.

Hard disagree there, the Scimmie is solid, and would only need minor fixes/buffs to go to 8.0 imo. Currently sat at a 2.3 K/D compared with a 2.6 K/D in the Fox. Although I do have an unhealthy obsession with CVRTs, so play the Scimmie farrrr to much…

Anyway to the topic at hand: the Jagdtiger is “fine”, it just hard counters armour while having decent armour itself, which can lead to a feeling of “What was I supposed to do against that?”, which can be pretty frustrating. Doesn’t mean it needs to be up BRed though.

2 Likes

Also:

1 Like

It would get cooked at 7.3. The main reason it’s at 6.7 is cuz it has incredible limited mobility and is easy to flank, it can’t really do anything against fast tanks. Also if u think the jadgtier is painful, have you ever seen a t98 on a city map? unkillable.

Dont dis our boi spookston. that man is a legend. Also, half the time he says “this tank is garbage i hate it” and then proceeds to wipe a lobby.

Does not help beating the sloptuber allegations there.

It’s extremely difficult for casemates to be OP by virtue of them being casemates. Jagdtiger especially is gimped by a long reload. It regularly faces APDS/HEAT and only proves to be a real problem if played correctly by staying a large distance away and sniping - but it has no enhanced rangefinder and a long reload.

If anything, it should be 6.3.

1 Like

agreed those things are a pain in the ass and annoying, I absolutely hate French 7.7 with a passion, 4.0 second autoloaders, and good armor, ugh I want to take a shower after I fight them

1 Like

Seeing France mains complain abt their ground tree is almost as annoying as seeing Japan mains complain abt their air tree.

I constantly think back to a time I shot one of those french autoloader thing’s barrel, watched my shot ricochet off, and he proceeded to whiff 2 shots Ina row, and still killed me with the third shot before I could either fire a second.

Fighting those things is such a massive load of Maus turd.

1 Like



I love when people have experience to talk about things

1 Like

And they screwed over the Israel lineup.

M-51 + TCM-20 + novice crew then… no decent light tank until 7.0 now.

Don’t understand why they don’t give Israel the M4A1 and M4A2 Shermans they collected after WW2… give time to develop crew at a lower BR. And they could fight alongside the TCM-20 at modest BRs where it should start.

I’m certainly glad I started Israel before they moved the M51 from 6.0 to 6.3. Same for the AMX-13 BR move.

1 Like

are you kidding saying the m51 is not even decent is probably by far the most stupid thing Ive heard/read all day, that thing essentially gets HEATFS at 6.3 and the m109s are also still good cuz they get proxys and they can easily overpressure… only get decent from 7.0 my butt

Pt 76 is better than M-51 imo. I will never understand people who claim the M-51 is OP.

Not to mention, ikv-103

Im not saying its OP but you have to admit it is still a good tank

Honestly, I’d say it’s mid at best. M36B2 does everything the M-51 does, and better.

true and doesnt the M36B2 also get APHE

image

And can be killed by single HE shell that only has to hit it.

Yep. It also gets a roof mounted .50cal instead of .30cal