Oh we’re not going to skip over this, you’re going to answer lol
No backpedaling bud, own up to your mistake!
Oh we’re not going to skip over this, you’re going to answer lol
No backpedaling bud, own up to your mistake!


Yo @BlueBeta, can you help out here? Som1 is just using statshame arguments and derailing the thread.
I barely play anti airs. That’s the simple answer but the amx 10p is incredibly good compared to other anti airs of similar brs again maybe you just don’t know how to aim it. And that’s fine.
Yet you’re so qualified to talk about them?
You figure that out in 7 games? Wow!
Gepard stabilized leopard 1 isn’t. Ofc the Gepard is more favored lmao
Again I don’t play anti airs. But yes its incredibly good if you just use 3 braincells
You’re just a troll who intentionally says things that you know are against the rules but are hidden behind enough doublespeak to where you can get away with it, and the mods here go along with it. I don’t care lmao I’ll be back after the temp mute to shame you
So you’re admitting you don’t know what you’re talking about?
I was talking about the stabilized leopards buddy
Can you read? I said I don’t play anti airs I personally don’t enjoy them. But it’s incredibly good
When people resort to stat-shaming, they have already lost the argument but their egos don’t want to admit they did.
A 9.3 leopard 1 vs 8.3 anti air. That 8.3 bracket is way nicer to the leopard 1.
And the Gepard basically the only good German 8.0 area tank lmao
Pangolin does the same thing except instead of stat shaming he just says you’re bad at the game because he’s allowed to do that, but NOT use statistics to “prove” his point. You’re only “agreeing” with him because he happens to be on “your side” of the discussion. This is so plainly see through.
And the anti air is the better of the two at being an MBT, crazy.
Because the anti air is at a better br. The 1a5 has brutal uptiers where it’s outclassed by everything and the regular leopard 1 is unstabilized at a br where alot of tanks are starting to get them
Buddy, read this carefully
If you uptier the Gepard to the 9.3 battle rating, it is a better main battle tank than the leopard 1a5 that sits at 9.3, in a direct comparison.
I would disagree with that completely lmao the 1a5 works much better then the Gepard at 9.3. idk why your so upset over the Gepard anyways
Good for you. You’re wrong.
Whatever you say
These have needed adjusting for a while, and while it would break some new ground, it wouldn’t require much.
This could be done by having an inverse of fuze sensitivity. If the round penetrates armor that’s too strong (Say 40mm effective?), the fuze is destroyed and the filler doesn’t detonate. This renders them still fairly scary against light vehicles, and on the flanks (Which they should be), but largely helpless against MBTs frontally.
Still needs a more permanent fix for volumetric, but that’s out of scope for this.
This is a more systemic change (but hey, it might fix the exact same issue with the exact same cause for various Soviet autloading carousels eating spall without exploding), and it strictly optional.