All the F-5E needs to do is force two circle and that’s stupid easy against a Kfir.
I did not, it isn’t.
The Draken simply beats it in a dogfight but has limited countermeasures for it to be particularly well suited for air RB. It bleeds speed easily when engaged by multiple opponents and has poor acceleration which makes it perform worse in regards to efficiency than the F-5E.
Two aim9j, two mid tier 20mm that barely do any damage (i can vouch for it as I have survived thousands of f5 guns), mach 1.02 on the deck aganst stuff that do mach 1.1 minimum, huge maneuverability reduction at high speed, clocks 29 degrees of turn rate only below 8min of fuel and at 800ias
something that has the least armament options, is the slowest and has the lowest thrust curve of any 10.7 fighter does NOT make it “the best”
the draken can catch up and out dogfight the j7e, the mig23 mld, the mirage 2000. The f-5e cannot and even struggles against mig21s whenever they don’t take the ratefight bait. This is literally like saying that the zero is OP because it out turns most stuff, even despite funnily enough some spitfires turn inside it and the yaks can reverse it at high speed.
you like to scream I say nonsense, while literally considering a plane that the mig19, a fighter a generation older, can deal safely with, “the best 10.7” where the average 10.7 is 300kmh faster and has twice the amount of (and quality of) missiles. The Draken can reach up to 1450kmh on the deck and keep such speeds. The F-5E will drag down to mach 1.1 maximum after a dive and then go back to mach 1.03. The Draken can also out rate and out turn the j7e, the f-5e can’t.
Right, try again
Just read the text again and think about it. Or else, keep dying to (not the zero) but the (even worse) N1K2J of rank 7.
Side comparison in case you don’t know how n1k2j flies like: The N1K2J has good climb rate, ridiculous energy retention and 900 rounds of quad 20mm, does that mean the plane is a super prop? No, The majority of 6.0s have around the same amount of ammo, better balistics, and the planes themselves generally turn tighter at higher speeds (of which the n1k can’t reach and in case of reaching it won’t be able to turn for how much it compresses) it’s at 6.0 when it should be 5.3 at best.
Long story short: the draken XS can catch up and out dogfight the majority of 10.7-11.7, the f-5e can only out fight 10.3 and below IF they dare engaging OR are slower than it. Period.
MY MAIN GRIPE with the f5e is how bad results the guns give me. It’s always white text. Hit, hit, hit, severe damage, hit. The guns themselves have very little HE filler and explode before entering the target’s frame; and the API rounds overpenetrate up close and ricochet far away.
Does it? I’ve found the 11.3 F-5E FCU quite enjoyable in terms of flight performance. Only thing it really is missing is speed, but even then it has enough to fight and, most importantly, keeps it well. Then you have you 45 flares that, while not much, work really well simply for the airframe being so cold.
the FCU is well backed up by the missiles the f-5e can only dream of (plus the pythons). Speed wise ? i mean, actually speed alone wouldn’t matter, if it wouldn’t be such a brick past mach 1 where it simply refuses to pull and everything else turns inside it. The F-5C does not suffer from this compression issue and I can do better in it at 11.3 than I do with the F-5E precisely because despite being EVEN slower I can safely one circle MLD’s and even drakens 💀and they will mostly run away with a red engine. Sure, the F-5E is a menace against 9.7, but aren’t the draken EVEN more menaces with it’s six missiles? Sure, they’re the ASS-9Js but they still better on six than on two. Besides, you can dedicate at least two of these missiles to take down incoming fox1s within burning stage. If the F-5E had four aim9j’s it would be different. It’s the extremely lackluster missile quality count and draggy bullets coupled with the horrible high speed handling what make me despise the f-5e so much. The last match I had on F-5E was like this:
And so are most of the matches that I have at 11.0 or higher. If the j7e deployed flaps he would have ABSOLUTELY ended me in the first turn. And yet, he had the last word because m39s are literally white text guns.
It’s an energy/dogfight god at its BR from my experience, in the fur-balls which constantly happen this thing thrives. Constantly running away from it may be effective for survival, but it ain’t gonna help you win the match most of the time.
an energy dogfighting god that gets out energied and out fought by everything!
in the furballs where everyone is flaring and quickly turning away, the f-5e with the flare-hungry aim9j’s and the flight model of a brick totally thrives!!!
Constantly running away from it may be effective for survival, but it ain’t gonna help you win the match most of the time.
that’s because you not only out run it, you also out dog fight. Go one circle, and you will win. Go ultra high speed and you will win. Go ultra slow speed and you will win. If it rates just extend and repeat.
If I make this post is because I fly both the f-5e and the MiG21 SMT and i see F-5E’s every match. It’s not a good plane and I know it’s weaknesses. It can’t even go one circle and out rate against a MiG23M and the MiG23M is the worst 11.0. Now if the worst 11.0 is FAR superior to “the best 10.7” what is this kind of logic?
Oh , I see the lethany people has of praising aircraft with good energy retention. Energy retention alone doesn’t win matches, it makes you harder to kill, but just that. if you have energy retention and great maneuverability you will stomp, The F-5E has quite averagely mid maneuverability for most 10.7-11.7 and it’s easy to send it out of the match the moment you land your gun on it. In other words, just like people overrate props with high damage guns, people overrate jets with high energy retention.
It has insane energy retention and turns incredibly well but I have to agree that the guns are the worst i’ve played on a modern jet, they’re underpowered
I prefer playing the F-8E which has a better package, has good radar missiles, a lot better guns, turn goods and insane energy retention, you can easily follow a mig23 in a dogfight
F-5E is good enough for its BR. All F-5s in game have really cold engines that make them less vulnerable to IR missiles which is a huge advantage. Yes in a uptier it suffers but in a downtier it’s really good.
F-5E is also quite good for multirole tasks. I usually bring it in grb and it performs really well.
Again - pointing to planes that are under tiered due to lack of armament or countermeasures. The performance of the MiG-19 is obviously higher than the F-5E currently. You keep making these terrible arguments. No one is “screaming” either unless you count making threads complaining about non-existent problems nonstop…