flight performance package?
hmmm
let’s rewind
-300kmh slower than most stuff at the BR
-less thrust than most stuff at the BR
-less nose authority than most stuff at the BR
flight performance? hmmmmmmmm
let me reread again
-300kmh slower than any other 10.3 or higher fighter (except the crusader wich fights on it’s side 99 percent of the situations)
-less engine power than the majority of 10.3-11.7 things
-less nose authority making it really hard to quickly snap onto position and shoot
i don’t know bub, sounds like an absolute shit plane to me.
I dont know how accurate this may be but you could probably decoy an R-73 or Magic 2 from under 1km on full AB.
1 Like
despite i’m better than you in it, I still don’t agree.
bruh your stats are worse than mine and you wanna talk shit…
as someone who uses magic 2s on f-5s AND received all aspects, I can tell you that it’s not true. Why? Because if you’re in one of these fighters with magic 2s you’re SO DIABOLICALLY FAST that you can get within the km and shoot the missile with such extra kinetic energy it will not have time to see the flares. That’s very much how pl5b works too. And I’ve eaten them too from 1km away on f-5e while flaring burner off.
shit fighter fighting shitter players
literally why the re2005, the j7w1, the la9, the j5n1 and the sea fury are so stupid high in BR.
I had an F-5E decoy an Aim-9M about 30° off tail. whilst sat on reheat a few days ago with a handful of flares. he didnt even really turn just flew in a straight line. Meanwhile ive been hit by Aim-9Es in the Sea harrier with a hard viff turn and mutliple flares being dropped.
The F-5Es temp is insane. The issue is how the game doesnt model the engine exhaust and only the engine temp. Engine temp might be right, but the plume should be a few hundred degrees hotter than the engine temp
1 Like
The aim9m is inconsistent. Of course if you viff while dropping flares you’re going to not just lose speed but also accumulate heat around you making the missile simply strike you. That’s how aim9e’s “seem to ignore flares” because you launch them on people moving so slowly they’re just a mass of hot air.
I agree the f-5e is cold, I have seen the f-5em tiger in person and that shit not only is deafening loud on idle, it also has an insane trail of heat haze behind the tail. It’s impossible for me to take photos of the f-5e from behind for how much heat it dumps.
Still, the f5e is easy to gun down. Once again, give it the zero treatment.
VIFFing in Harrier should turn a rear aspect shot into a side aspect shot and gives you significantly more G pull…
“Accumalate heat” is just not a real thing. Even IRL. ACTUAL Sea Harrier Tactics, is to Viff to about 30° when defending an IR missile. Just Gaijin models the harrier really really really badly.
Also Sea Harrier is Sub-Sonic. Of course its bloody slow. its not a super-sonic dogfighter like the F-5 is
1 Like
Here is all the evidence we need
2 Likes
-300kmh slower than the competence
-worst quality of missiles (and worst amount thereof) of 10.3+
-worst thrust of any 10.3+ afterburning jet
-despite maneuverable it still can’t out dogfight kfirs, viggens and drakens of it’s same BR
yeah, defo bait. Like the one you take that makes you die to an f-5e.
who gives a care about the thrust values looking low when the F-5 is one of the lightest airframes in the BR bracket? T/W is more important.
3 Likes
The only one of these that is true is the Draken, which is definitely under tiered if it weren’t for lack of CM’s on all but the premium.
For those that don’t know, the Draken can hold a higher sustained turn than pretty much anything that isn’t a gen4+ fighter on low fuel.
-edit- idk why Mantis liked my comment cuz I proved he’s wrong about nearly everything. The Draken is still not a guaranteed win against the F-5E. It’s obviously the best airframe at the BR of 10.7
1 Like
yeah, too bad it’s highest T/W values are when the plane is completely unable to nose onto targets nor have peak turn rate. Oh, also everything else at 10.7 and above has HIGHER thrust weight ratio than the f-5e in most scenarios.
The highest T/W values are always also correlating to peak sustained turn rate for the F-5E…
Most other 10.7 fighters have inferior energy retention regardless. You’re speaking nonsense.
the f-5e can definitely outrate the kfir c7 but the kfir c7 can boom and zoom it all day, also go one circle. As I said before the f-5e thrives if people dare to engage it and even if it does, the f-5e needs to have a serious advantage.
-edit- idk why Mantis liked my comment cuz I proved he’s wrong about nearly everything. The Draken is still not a guaranteed win against the F-5E. It’s obviously the best airframe at the BR of 10.7
I liked your comment because I agree with most of it, I’m not hate-based. If someone says something I consider to be right, I will agree with it. That’s literally the basis of arguments and conversations.
You pointed out that the Draken is better than the f-5e for air RB. For a prolonged dogfight? They’re pretty equal, but the draken still holds it at slower speeds.
peak sustained turn rate? where the plane literally turns a brick and even phantoms turn inside it?
yeah. Very high TWR. Still, gets turned inside by phantoms. F-5E loses.
Just a small tangent: Most fights in air RB happen to be one-circle or rolling scissors in order to cut enemies from running away. If literally every fighter can run away from the f-5e the f-5e shall bait into one circle fights it mostly can win, before entering the rate fights. Either the enemy runs away, or the enemy kills the f-5e, or the enemy is bad enough to die one circle to a plane that literally turns wider than the mig19. And despite how much speed delta wings bleed, they happen to be the hardest targets for the f-5e within 10.3 and 10.7, both because they run away from it and definitely do turn inside it.
Almost always is with Ghidorah
