The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Heavy Cavalry”! — 05.06.2026

Lots of nations have not received a “direct counterpart” all in this update. Not just Germany.

This is not something exclusive to Germany

1 Like

when did France get a new MBT that wasn’t a subnation

may i point your attention to


image
image
10.0 GRB BR

surely not a that much a difference when compared to Su-22M3 at a whole 1.3 below Tornado GR.1 then?

2 Likes

You said “vehicles of that BR [11.3]”. Which implies that there is an 11.7 BR cut off below which aircraft should not receive ARMs? Is that not the case?

Also is ALARM going to receive its parachute? If not then it is likely going to be comparable (or inferior) in performance to the Soviet ARMs.

It also begs the question of why we haven’t seen the AS.37 Martel on platforms like the Buccaneer, when it is an ARM of limited capability, on a platform of limited capability.

In the context of supersonic aircraft like Tornados with ALARM and HARM.

Certain AGMs are considered for certain BRs and above yes.

This feature is not currently planned.

We fought so long to get these st*pid Tonkas down to 11.3, and now we cant even get AGM-88A because of the lower BR, what a classic…
Time to fight to get it up in BR…

Without this feature, these will prove strictly worse than their competition. Why do you lot consistently cut features from British armament that degrade otherwise adequate performance to substandard performance?

3 Likes

Sir, this does not actually answer my question. As you know, the US, Germany, and Russia have the most unique matchmaking mechanics in the game, which means these three nations should bear a greater responsibility for leading their teams to victory.
Therefore, in a sense, these three nations should indeed receive special treatment—for example, getting top-tier vehicles earlier than the other seven tech trees.
The data shows that Germany has the lowest win rate at top tier, so I believe it is both normal and necessary for Germany to be prioritized when it comes to receiving new vehicles.

Anyone documented the limitation of binding munitions to more than 4 Aim Points? This is a pretty bothersome limitation.

I have answered your question. You are basing your understanding on:

When they do not. There is no rule Germany must get something at the same time. The same has been the case for the other nations too in the past.

Soviet ARMs have proven particularly effective in my testing, with the only lacking munition being the kh25. If the parachute is neglected, ALARM will not be particularly comparable.

1 Like

then why is the Su-22M3 at 10.0 with Kh-58 and 27?

Neither are anaemic ARMs

1 Like

Hai @Smin1080p_WT ,would it be possible to know if this Bug Report have been forgotten about?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/h6MB1wHE4KNc
Seeing as there was no info even with the release of dev server for this major. Thanks in advance!

‘Morning, Smin! I wanted to ask something;

Do you know whether this post has drawn the attention of the developers yet, and/or whether it may actually have any impact on the de idioma being made around this tank?

2 Likes

i’m just gonna go ahead and guess no, gaijin loves neglecting western vehicles considering the buff for L27A1 wasnt accepted because they need specific details and dates (classified information) for it to be considered and it’s just makes you wonder what the point is in trying anymore

helis can now wipe out tanks without showing themselves but brimstone 2’s are too op to be added
ok?

10 Likes

But Thai can’t get VT-4 you know?

2 Likes

The man in the loop feature shouldnt be implemented for helis.

3 Likes

Hey. Its Monday, so generally not much has happened over the weekend. However feedback from the dev server will continue to be passed on all subjects.

10 Likes