With what, a single plane ?
While they use differents versions of the Leopards, British and Americans Planes ?
They would be missing all the Dutch vehicles.
Some vocal people. Trying to speak for “everyone” on the internet always makes an argument sound weaker, and silly.
How wonderfully melodramatic.
Germany can have Austria and Switzerland.
So they don’t miss anything. When there are equivalents for each of the vehicles offered, adding them is useless.
I personally don’t see a problem here.
Or, add both. It’s never either/or.
Some vocal people. Trying to speak for “everyone” on the internet always makes an argument sound weaker, and silly.
Ironic. You’re clearly so out of touch with what French mains want it’s laughable.
They would be missing all the Dutch vehicles.
Anything worthwhile? Nope. Next question.
Gaijin has proven that it’s “either/or”
Find me a dev statement on this, I’ll wait.
This entire thread is pointless, as the subtree is already coming. If you want to ask for other vehicles in the future, do that.
With developers nothing is ever certain, on the other hand with the experience of the latest additions of subtrees we must realize that this is the case
This entire thread is pointless, as the subtree is already coming. If you want to ask for other vehicles in the future, do that.
Find me a dev statement on this, I’ll wait
As long as the tree is not added I intend to fight to make it as little worse as possible
Misread on the comment. I read it as Dutch vehicles in France means no Dutch vehicles elsewhere.
The UK has just been slowly getting vehicles that South Africa took the place of. They still don’t have a domestic Howitzer for example.
Otherwise, I disagree. This thread is still very useful. It just devolved into nonsensical arguing. While I don’t like people telling me that I should like something when I don’t.
Sub-trees have never been added to “fill gaps that shouldn’t be there”.
That wasn’t the official line by Smin? People are saying that Smin said subtrees are there to fill the gaps. I don’t have screenshots of him saying this, hence my question
Hmm? Your post makes no sense since you quoted me not mentioning Smin; and you quoted me quoting “that shouldn’t be there” but don’t address that part of the quote…
“fill gaps that can’t be filled otherwise” =/= “fill gaps that shouldn’t be there”.
And it does. A Leopard adds significantly more diversity and flavour to the tree than “six Leclerc prototypes”.
No it does not. Leopard in every tree does not bring “diversity and flavour” to the game. Top tier is already infested with Leopard tanks, more Leclercs is needed.
You’re looking in a very narrow “France doesn’t have any leopard tanks” and forget the bigger view “Leopards outnumber Leclercs in the game”
Nah, us swedes got austria first-
They also have a cool draken variant I would like to see added.
France has Leclercs and does not have Leos, this is very much increasing diversity.
The game overall has few Leclercs and tons of Leos. This is decreasing diversity. Not to mention that we have zero Leclerc prototypes in the game.
France also doesn’t need VB1002, but it was added cause it’s cool.
AMX-13 HOT is also cool despite being hilariously not that useful.
Not needed and French origin planes are fine though. It ticks one box atleast, which is that it is French origin.
Hmm? Your post makes no sense since you quoted me not mentioning Smin
What is the purpose of subtrees then, if not what Gaijin officially intended?
As both of us said, fill gaps is one of the reasons.
However, as I said it is not to fill gaps that can be filled by domestic options.
However, as I said it is not to fill gaps that cannot be filled by domestic options.
I mean like
Thats the whole point of a subtree…
To fill gaps that domestic designs cant cover