The 120s should be move from 10.3 to 10.0 because the only armor capable of non-pen or bouncing round of is its turret. Also, its turret ring is more exposed than the m1 Abrams. Its chassis (the m60 chassis) armor is slightly better than the m60 because it gets side skirts. Also, the 120s is so slow for the br it could use a slight mobility buff as well. If you disagree, please respond why. Also, devs take not of this post please. Edit the 120s has the abilty to be fitted with 1200hp AVDS-1790 engine
3 Likes
It’s a 120mm Abrams turret at 10.3. The point is to be hulldown and snipe. You’re not supposed to brawl, and the main strength isn’t when it’s fully exposed. It’s more than good where it’s at, you can’t rely on armor to be a good tank. Its firepower is able to slice through anything like a knife through butter at its BR. The only thing holding it back is mobility.
its an m1a1 turret at 10.3 thats barely low enough even with a patton hull
I get that it’s meant for sniping but when I get full uptier as usual I can barely do anything to the bmpt. Also, whenever I finally get to a good position I suddenly get killed by something from 11.0+
120S has a really good turret armor that can stop common rounds at 10.3.
It also has amazing gun handling with 5s reload firing M829A1 and gen2 thermals.
Yes, it is slow but any mobility buff would most likely push it up to 10.7.
1 Like
You only get this type of FCS on Abrams at 12.0 bro if it weren’t for AIM you have to wait until 12.7 lol
1 Like
Bro, Abrams hull and a top tier dart…
120S should move to 10.7.
The fact it uses a top tier round, has gen 2 thermals, an Abrams turret, and its only downside is the hull armor and mobility…
T-72A TURMS is the same BR with similar to slightly better mobility, worse overall armor, and a worse round.
Absolutely wild.
With 1200HP it’d need to be 11.0.
The fact my M60 AMBT is still 10.0 is a crime as well, if it was in the USSR tech tree it’d be 10.7 at least.
That’s not true. We’ve got the T90A with 3BM60 at 11.0 when, realistically, it could do just fine at 11.7 (in fact, that’s where I’ve been running it).
And USA has the superior Merkava Mk3 at 11.3 currently.
Tbf, idk why Gaijin didn’t add them to the Israeli TT other than how they were event vehicles (unfun fact, it’s going for a whopping 180 GJN atm). At least the Merkava Mk 3D has no real protection against KE rounds (MANGO punches through most of the front like a hot knife through butter) whereas the T-90A has pretty substantial armor where it is currently.
Wanted to add that in February, the T-90A had 842,385 games played v the Merkava Mk 3Ds 10,499. You’re over 80 times more likely to run into a T-90A v the Mk 3D.