It’s quite literally the exact same motor used on the Naval ESSM
1 Like
Ok no, you are just spouting actual BS now.
QUAD PACKED VLS IS THE LITERAL PRIMARY DESIGN REASON FOR THE ESSM!
4 Likes
there is a lot of things that you don’t understand about surface to air missiles and this is coming from someone who has trained on nasams irl.
7 Likes
mk-29 box launcher
Mortis
You’ve proven at length you have 0 idea what you are talking about.
1 Like
?? Then explain it to me, I’m ready to learn.
You just said that it can only be launched from vertical launchers, and the MK-29 is not a vertical launcher.
Lmao, no, you said and I quote
You are the only one here dealing in absolutes, don’t you date try to brush off the fact that you willingly spouted a falsehood trying to posture it as fact.
At this point I wish we could pull a mod into here as you are obviously trying to derail this thread.
1 Like
I understand the state of the game more and more. This is critical. You try to refute what I said, you’re wrong, and I’m the one trying to say something that is false as fact, OK?
Ok no thats a report and a block, have fun in your own delusions.
2 Likes
Report, I did nothing wrong, I am still waiting for the primary sources and declassified documents.
Brother you couldn’t be this blind, they are the exact same motor, the weight difference is like 1kg difference, how does a ship going 55.5 kilometers an hour give the same motor just with a different seeker that is has a weight difference of like 1kg struggle to hit 50km+ and Mach 4+ on a completely static system. It makes no sense what so ever
5 Likes
wow
Do not engage with him, he is just trolling at this point, flag his posts and move on.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It’s not on a plane going Mach 1 to which the range would be much further because the plane is moving Mach 1 giving the missile more power to fling off into the air (idk if this is the correct wording)
You clearly have no idea what you are saying
3 Likes
You know that just because you say I’m wrong doesn’t mean I am wrong. The proof is that all reports have been denied and no changes have been made yet. I ask again for objective sources. If you don’t have any, you can rage like the other guy did and block me. If you want to continue debating, with counterarguments, I’m here to see who’s right.
You just have no idea bro, genuinely stop believing the mods because even they can be wrong about anything
2 Likes
I just gotta ignore you because you are too dense and refuse to acknowledge you are simply wrong and can’t see that the motor is the exact same
1 Like