Thank you, Gajin Entertainment. (Anti-rebelling)

Lets all just admit that gajin is doing amazing things this past year. and i’m serious. (not sirius, NOT THE STAR! IM VELA!) new brake lights, wing vapor, muzzle flashes, War Thunder is sureley but slowly becoming GHPC and DCS in one game. for Naval tho… i’m not sure. either way, gajin is doing amazing things with war thunder and we should be able to see that by now.

People say “Gajin is so lazy!” they aren’t. It takes a bunch of time to make new updates and this and that, so we can just wait and wait.

“But the Br compression and endless grind!”

you won’t get this immediately. just like the grind it takes time just like how they make updates. like #Stona_WT said, it takes time for devs to do allat and they do need to sleep as well. you won’t just get tanks planes ships immediately. nearly every game on the globe is literally supposed to be hard.

Thank you all for reading this.

2 Likes

yeah uh i uhhhh uhhhhhhhh hmmm

ESM for nato vehicles? no, but they can give R-77 to a premium russian vehicle at 12.7 air.

sorry man, gaijin is undefendable.

THEY DID WHAT?!
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! WHYYYYY

sigh

su-39, and I bet it has to do with unique scorpion’s insufferable nagging at gaijin to add them to it.

1 Like

2 R-77 , WOW broken in subsonic airframe

8 Likes

1 Like

And better yet, they take up R73 pylons.

If you could carry 4x73 and 4x77, sure it would be mildly outrageous (mildly because its still a box that cant fly past mach 0.85)

I find it sad that the TT SU25T is being left in the dust.
In an ideal world, we would have a TT SU25TM and SU39 as premium (copy paste) , not have the premium variant be vastly superior.

2 Likes

Let’s not forget they broke MITL(Man in the loop) on console 2 months ago(fully inverted the controls and made it so you can’t lock with it) and haven’t fixed it. Yeah no I can’t defend gaijin if they keep ignoring my bug reports.

But if su-39 carry 4 r-77 13.0 is ok br , but 2 , It would be crazy put in 13.0

Why would it be crazy? Can’t we just accept that an attacker won’t be an air-to-air monster or even be viable to play in an air-to-air focussed gamemode? Why does an attacker need to be even competitive in an air-to-air gamemode, especially since nuclear thunder exists now which gives attackers actually something to do

I hate the fact that we’re having weapons from the 2000’s fighting against weapons from the 1980’s just because ‘airframe bad’.

Let attackers just do attacker stuff. Not every plane needs to be viable/competitive/balanced in every gamemode. You want to play ARB? Play Mig 29 instead of Su-25. Seems pretty obvious to me you would get your ass kicked all around if you’re flying a subsonic attacker in an air-dominance air mode. But Gaijin needs to ‘balance’ it so it’s still ‘viable’ to fly with attackers into dogfights? WHY?!?!?

R77’s are weapons from the 2000’s. They belong at 13.3. ANY R-77.

1 Like

But that’s why the BR is dynamic, with an R-77 of 12.7 , only ground-attack 11.3 , having two R-77s and being at 13.0 makes no sense

Full Copium

so cool gaijin IR 15 guided bombs on 11.0

WHY does it not make sense? It’s still an attacker. Why does it make sense an attacker is competitive in air-to-air combat AT ALL? No, that does not make sense. It’s cool it has 2 R-77 for self-defense in nuclear thunder.

No, peopele should not be able to fly Su-25’s or A-10’s into ARB and expect to be able to do anything. Seems pretty obvious to me if F-15’s and Mig-29’s are around.

It’s like in real-life, an A-10 or Su-25 would never fly into any territory where complete air dominance is not guaranteed.

1 Like

another please be nice to gaijin post

2 Likes

Only work in ships lol, Not having something and arguing about it is complicated

It’s still not competitive, that’s what the Br’s dynamic is for to give the planes their actual armaments and let the player choose whether to use them or n

My point is that 12.7 is still too low for an SU-25 (39) with R-77’s. The lowest other plane with real fox-3’s is the British Sea Harrier which has aim-120’s at 13.0. So in fact this is the lowest BR plane with Fox-3’s now, which sets a precedent.
They do this because they want to make a Su-39 ‘competitive’. And my question is, WHY do they want to make a Su-39 ‘competitive’. It shouldn’t be competitive in the first place so just put it at 13.0 or 13.3 like the rest of R-77 planes. No it’s not competitive at that BR in air-to-air combat, and yes its going to get clapped at 13.3. Like it should be. It’s an attacker and a sitting duck. It should do attacker stuff instead of doing air combat.

Also increase the BR of A-10’s with 9L and 9M’s.

1 Like

Can carry 4 ,

No men , su-39 still shit plane

So what? Okay, here is the point. I hate Fox-3 gameplay. I play 12.7 and don’t want to deal with any Fox-3 planes. I want to LARP 1980’s end-of-cold war ‘what could have happened’, Mig-29’s with R-27’s against F-15’s with Aim-7

And suddenly boom a time-traveled Su-39 from the 2000’s with Fox-3’s shows up. Its stupid.

I wish they would order planes and loadout by historical time-period instead of trying to ‘balance’ BR’s to make planes competitive.

1 Like