but r-27er and aim-7m/ p are 2000s missiles
And if you play 12.7 you will get fox-3
No, not in SIM where for example 12.7 can be a maximum BR. Then you are ensured you don’t get any Fox-3 (except Phoenix ofcourse) planes because again the lowest fox-3 plane is the 13.0 Harrier. But that has changed now. We now have Fox-3’s at 12.7.
but r-27er and aim-7m/ p are 2000s missiles
WOW. No. AMRAAM was introduced in 1993. Yes, the 27-ER came even after AMRAAM. The F/A-18C(early) is literally the ‘mig-killer’ plane that flew in the Gulf War 1991 (with 7P). AIM-120 came ‘just’ too late for the Gulf war but immediately after.
1 Like
I still say that two R-77s on an Su-39 are useless if you die because of that, it’s your own fault
They only guide on boats.
1 Like
R-77 in 94 , if 3 or 2 years is big diff for you IDK
AND aim-7p enter service 94
Bruh.
The Russian Aerospace Forces finally entered the R-77-1 (AA-12B) into service in 2015
But yes, ALL OF THIS is a big deal. I hate the choices Gaijin makes regarding load-outs, especially of the Mig-29. They have the Mig-29 with R-27ER but with R-60 which is completely stupid and a-historical. I would love to have a Mig-29 with R-73 + R-27(non-ER!) which is a historic late 1980’s configuration instead of a fictional and wrong Mig-29 with R-60 and R-27ER. With the R-27ER they make some BVR monster from the Mig-29 instead of the awesome close-range dogfighter the Mig-29 actually is with the R-73.
The historical battle would be Mig-29 (R-73+R-27R) VS F-15A / F-16 ADF with Aim-9M + Aim-7M. How cool would that be.
R-73 came way earlier in service than R-27ER… Why do we have planes with ER but flying with R-60’s???
Same for 9M and AIM-120. 9M came way earlier than the AIM-120. Why do we have stuff that have AIM-120 but still don’t have AIM-9M (like the F-16ADF). The F-16ADF should have 9M+AIM-7 instead of 9L + AIM-120…
R-77 and r-77-1 are diff missile
That’s true. But we can debate the R-77 (non -1) came into service at all. The Russians did nothing after the collapse of the soviet union. The missile entered in official service as the R-77-1 in 2015. Russian air force did not actually acquire R-77 until 2015 (as the improived R-77-1) but Russia did export it as RVV-AE before that.
apply that for whw do we have plane with r-24r and r-60 fighting plane with r-27er and aim-7p
Are we seriously malding over a subsonic boat getting 2 R-77s at a BR flooded with F-18, 16 and 15s?
1 Like
He is, I think that’s fine
Well , you see , a brick that CANNOT go past M0.86 is a biiig biiig threat because 2 or the R73s were replaced with R77s (which also forces you to carry the radar pod, which is terrible for performance)
1 Like
They are
1 Like
It still wont be, anyone who can notch an AHR or catches it when it has nothing left is suck fighting a brick. any 12.7 airframe will be VASTLY superior.
Battlerattings are decided based on kit AND airframe. it makes zero sense being any higher in BR since it has 2 R77s… Its still a heavy, slow brick. just get past the merge and gun it down with your superior airframe
1 Like
The FA.2 could also go down to 12.7 and there would be ZERO pushback. Its arguably worse then the SU39 now since youre trading your guns for those 2 extra Aim120s, worse RWR and no ECM device.
how much you getting paid?
wasnt it meant for cas?
They’re antiship bombs that switch to IR guidance after they’re dropped (no seeker camera for locking a target like a SPICE/HOSBO/KAB-500Kr etc), for a ground vehicle they’re essentially dumb bombs
1 Like