The Namer and Terminator, at present, are fairly equal. While the Namer might have better penetration, an APS, and more maneuverability, it also has fewer useful missiles, a significantly lower firerate, and worse armor (cause Gaijin says so).
I don’t see why the Terminator should see any 9.3 vehicles, let alone be lower than the KF41 and Puma.
Remind me again why the Namer was moved up from 10.3? Something something belts hard to hit, near-immortal hulldown, 9.3 IFV were helpless against it, etc etc.
You say “shoot the ammo” in practice, but you forget that the 30mm might get a single shot off due to its firerate by the time the 2A42 dumbs ten rounds. Not to mention APFSDS Spall is generated by left over penetration, and the Terminator isn’t thin even around the belts. It’s basically a spall liner.
if you 50cal the missiles its dead like the bmp2m
Ah yes, because I’m definitely going to 50 cal the Terminators missiles in view of him long enough to kill him. Definitely.
Sorry, but I can’t grasp how you think being able to 50 cal their missiles makes this balanced. That logic could easily stretch to the M2A2.
An aluminum box, like the CV9030, should not face a tank with T-90M protection, even if you can “hit the missile”. I highly doubt the Terminator would die if you hit its external Atakas. It’s extremely unfinished as of right now, so I wouldn’t take anything on that model as gospel.
Once again, I must reiterate that the Puma and KF41 are 11.0 and objectively worse in all aspects.
Nah I’m tired of this pointless discussion honestly. Lets just wait and see in game how it truly performs
I mean a good chunk of the reason the bmpt will be strong at 10.3 is that 10.3 russia is incredibly strong if you want to pay gaijin a lot of money, they should put it to at least 10.7 just to not make the 10.3 lineup even stronger
they have fnf missiles
Inb4 BMP-T is proven to be yet another nothingburger in actual games, just like vehicles like BUK or Object 775.
Come on don’t act like SPIKE/Akeron have ever been worth their weight.
I’m always taking a beam-riding russian missile that has a player-reliant hit rate instead of RNG
Probably true if it came in at 11.3, but why tf is this a whole BR bracket below the Namer, that’s genuinely insane
I can predict how it will be. The Terminator will destroy all random enemies at 9.3-11.3. No one will be able to penetrate this heavy, multi-layered armor. And this will go on for 3-4 months, there will be hundreds of forum threads about how the Terminator is making it difficult to play, and the Gaijins will take pity on it, give it APFSDS shells, and bump it up to 10.7. There, it will continue to destroy everything alive.
the maximum is 10.7 above that will be bad i cant understand why you are all so sure that will be a monster at 10.3 it has only 1 30mm with apds and only 4 missiles( idont knowif they put more) its a bmp2m but in a t72 hull you can easily kill it or disable it
Can you name a 10.3 tank with this kind of armor?
It looks like a sidegrade (at best) to 2M.
Do me a solid and take a quick peek at the 10.3 light tanks other trees have and tell me if you see a difference
Difference is that Terminator is not a light tank
The BMP-2M doesn’t have 12.7 levels of hull armour does it
Neither is the Namer, but here we are
T-80UD.
Hell if we go for this kind of armor for it’s BR than the T95 is probably a tougher to crack for 7.0 than the BMPT for 10.3.
