More like they had the model and decided to use it for an event
no it is not, it does not have the V-92S2F 1130HP engine
It’ll probably go up because it’s a passable 11.0, will get spammed out as soon as available and be carried by BMPTs
2 Likes
Really not sure what people are expecting from the T-90A sidegrade since thats the same BR with the same dart.
A situational APS thats worse than the one on the B3A yippee
3 Likes
We want something else not another dogwater t-72 please
6 Likes
I was surprised too, by the way. It has the best thermal imager. It has excellent armor, mobility, and an active protection system that will intercept ATGMs and Hellfires. And that’s a shame. You know, the US has the M1A1 AIM, and it has a BR of 12.0, but it doesn’t have the A2 round. They gave it that BR because it has a second-generation thermal imager, not even a third-generation one.
3 Likes
I swear these topics are either rage bait or just good ol’ trolling.
8 Likes
Your 10.3 UD that is collecting dust has a better armor profile than this thing, the composite extends all the way to the lfp.
5 Likes
Saying it has excellent mobility is hilarious.
9 Likes
@_PrimeFox
Gen 2 thermals.
Worst mobility of 11.0.
T-72B armor.
KE-W equivalent dart.
T-72B3 with a significantly more powerful engine is 12.3.*
It should probably be 11.3, but 12.3 when all 12.3s in the game are infinitely superior to this event vehicle… let alone 12.0s, and a number of 11.7s… nah.
Your post is shilling far too hard in defense if this slow tank.
Win-ratio has nothing to do with anything.
2 Likes
Substantially better tank at a higher BR, what a mystery…
Your analysis.
The T-72B3 is 11.7. The T-72B3A (with Arena-M) is 12.3.
The T-73B3 at 11.7 has noticeably better armour (UBH Kit), a much better engine (and therefore better mobility). The Arena system is Arena-E which should have less capacity, less range, less coverage and is therefore worse. APS in game that cannot intercept APFSDS is pretty much a gimmick against anti-tank missiles (which already aren’t that good against T=Series because of ERA)
1 Like
Doesn’t the B3 at 11.7 also have the same engine?
The 11.7 B3 has the same engine as the 12.3 B3, both of which are higher in regards to a T-72B.
Taking a rather large mobility hit over T-90A for APS isn’t the benefit I think of.
Both should be 11.3, but it’ll take more convincing for me to support higher, and it’ll require talking about the BR compression at 2.7 ground.
I can see it being 11.3. and yes we need decompression bad
Early WW2 players suffer from compression while top ground is entirely decompressed.
Meh, I’d say they’re both compressed. Obviously some tiers more than others, Early WW2 and the 10-11 BR gap i feel like
1 Like
Man, instead of complaining about Russian technology, learn how to play and take a sober look at the situation. Try playing with Soviet tanks before you make any claims. If anything, the BM60 is available on the T90A and 2S25M.
It drives as fast or even faster than the Merkava.
1 Like
Dude, all of your comments on this topic is shilling for Russian equipment and trashing on everything else.
Merkava Mk3 fires an equivalent round, has a slightly better CQC orientation, and has at least slightly better mobility if not notably more.
Mobility matters more than top speed in forward direction.
1 Like
Just put it at 11.3.
It’s practically a T-90A with APS and much better gun handling but slightly worse turret armour and acceleration.
I wouldn’t say it’s better than the regular T-72B3, though it’s funny how the T-72B3A, which should really be at most 12.0, is 12.3.
1 Like
Considering it isn’t doing that hot at 11.0, I’d say B3 Arena is like high 11.0 or low 11.3.
No one would say that I’d think, I hope so at least.
1 Like