The lower BR is the point
1 Like
Stock performance doesn’t really matter.
5 Likes
no one compares stock vs stock
1 Like
Did we REALLY need this T-72?
15 Likes
was it rlly just so they could make a copy and paste like there are pretty much only 2 differences and only affects when they both have rank four mods
its the 11.7 TT version at a lower br with aps… not much else to say but fuck us and itll go up when gaijin have milked it enough.
1 Like
More like they had the model and decided to use it for an event
no it is not, it does not have the V-92S2F 1130HP engine
It’ll probably go up because it’s a passable 11.0, will get spammed out as soon as available and be carried by BMPTs
2 Likes
Really not sure what people are expecting from the T-90A sidegrade since thats the same BR with the same dart.
A situational APS thats worse than the one on the B3A yippee
3 Likes
We want something else not another dogwater t-72 please
6 Likes
I was surprised too, by the way. It has the best thermal imager. It has excellent armor, mobility, and an active protection system that will intercept ATGMs and Hellfires. And that’s a shame. You know, the US has the M1A1 AIM, and it has a BR of 12.0, but it doesn’t have the A2 round. They gave it that BR because it has a second-generation thermal imager, not even a third-generation one.
3 Likes
I swear these topics are either rage bait or just good ol’ trolling.
8 Likes
Your 10.3 UD that is collecting dust has a better armor profile than this thing, the composite extends all the way to the lfp.
5 Likes
Saying it has excellent mobility is hilarious.
9 Likes
@_PrimeFox
Gen 2 thermals.
Worst mobility of 11.0.
T-72B armor.
KE-W equivalent dart.
T-72B3 with a significantly more powerful engine is 12.3.*
It should probably be 11.3, but 12.3 when all 12.3s in the game are infinitely superior to this event vehicle… let alone 12.0s, and a number of 11.7s… nah.
Your post is shilling far too hard in defense if this slow tank.
Win-ratio has nothing to do with anything.
2 Likes
Substantially better tank at a higher BR, what a mystery…
Your analysis.
The T-72B3 is 11.7. The T-72B3A (with Arena-M) is 12.3.
The T-73B3 at 11.7 has noticeably better armour (UBH Kit), a much better engine (and therefore better mobility). The Arena system is Arena-E which should have less capacity, less range, less coverage and is therefore worse. APS in game that cannot intercept APFSDS is pretty much a gimmick against anti-tank missiles (which already aren’t that good against T=Series because of ERA)
1 Like
Doesn’t the B3 at 11.7 also have the same engine?
The 11.7 B3 has the same engine as the 12.3 B3, both of which are higher in regards to a T-72B.
Taking a rather large mobility hit over T-90A for APS isn’t the benefit I think of.
Both should be 11.3, but it’ll take more convincing for me to support higher, and it’ll require talking about the BR compression at 2.7 ground.
I can see it being 11.3. and yes we need decompression bad
Early WW2 players suffer from compression while top ground is entirely decompressed.