Yes
The base T-62 ammo wasn’t great at 8.7, some of the worst APFSDS short of the Type 69s and M41D and it’s what the 435 is stuck with at 9.0
The object 435 doesnt have long rod apfsds… both 3bm3 and 3bm4 are short rod.
1 Like
Gaijin logic - another happy customer.
The 3BM4 practically acts like a long-rod APFSDS in how lethal it is and how good it is against angles.
No… it is much worse than the 105 dm23 overall… not to mention that it is much more likely to ricochet than even apds.
Agains angles does worse than as well as the later apds or xm578e1 but being at the same time far more likely to ricochet.
I’m just telling about my experience as someone who frequently played this BR. The 115mm with the 3BM4 practically almost always one-shot for me and it felt unfair. It was the 100mm APFSDS that felt horrible to the point I switched to ATGMs as my main ammunition.
It has great speed, great composite armor, gun stabilization, apfsds… buying a vehicle doesn’t mean it will be the most op vehicle forever, if you buy an op vehicle you have to realise that it will get nerfed one day
this game is p2w ! i had this experience hundred thousand times …
game is p2w ! i had that proof thousand times against premiıum enemys with free ones …nobody need to tell me it is not … if some one pays for just 1 tank about 50 dollar it has to be p2w and it is ! …and i know and sure that the armour etc numbers on the specs are not works on the field by the premium ones…its just fake in my opinion,just optical…writing hull etc 100 just optical but can be programmed for 150 etc on the codes of the game… the codes of the game are not open source of course and cant be checked …except you are pro programmer …
“3BM4”, “lethal”
Bruh take some sleep.
What…? Have you looked at the Obj. 435’s rounds… one is steel ffs.
womp womp deal with it it was op a needed a br change lmao
2 Likes
While it is enough to pen most things it faced, the 115mm is not something remarkable in that br bracket, what’s the big deal about 3BM3/4 when everyone else has DM23/M111? The post pen damage also crap compare to M111. It’s near the bottom when it comes to stopping power, only above the 3BM25 lol when a Chinese tank destroyer in the same br has a 3BM42 equivalent.
Assuming this is a game and developers can do whatever they want, even making a 7.62mm bullet penetrate and do more damage than a 120mm bullet. This is comparing one of the first APDS-FS developed in the early 1960s with an APDS-FS from the late 1970s.
That round was making the TAM’s a nightmare to fight… And one time it non-penned t-55’s turret Cheek…
just because you bought something it doesnt mean its invulnerable to balancing, it has been op for years now.
you arent paying for a vehicle to stay at a BR
sorry your P2W tank is more balanced now
Need to buff t55ams hull armor to be the same as t64A as is historically accurate
Only way to make this work at 9.0
Next up the kv-1E