T-series, CAS and Pansier overpeforming

[SneedSellsFeed]

@Nano gaming765@live

You do realise a majority of what makes NATO tanks heavier isn’t armour but subsystems and other equipment such as Auxiliary power units and reinforcement to the suspension to allow for the greater weight which itself makes it heavier

And, you know - volume being a thing.

See - the problem is that you’re arguing with someone that isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed.

[SneedSellsFeed]

@HoRnDaddy89

The t90m is on par with m1a2 sep???!!! Lmao in what world? In what bloody world? Is that with its spall liner or how about the turret ring made of paper? Or how about loudest engine noise in the game when for a fact the Americans call the Abram’s the QUIET DEATH because it’s 100 percent quieter then the Russians engines yet in this game it sounds like a an airplane with an afterburner going off at WEP

In the same world where the Abrams has a 5 second reload, while a T-90M has a 7.1 second reload.
In the same world where the Abrams reverses at 34km/h, while the T-90M reverses at 3km/h.
In the same world where the T-90M has 5 degrees of gun depression, while the Abrams has 10.
In the same world where the Abrams fires M892A2 which penetrates nearly 50mm more than the T-90M’s 3BM60, while also having modeled increased damage due to DU properties.
In the same world where the Abrams has a turret rack with a blowout panel, while the T-90M has a bunch of ammo in the middle.
In the same world where the Abrams has a turret ring weakspot, while the T-90M has a lower plate, driver’s port and 20mm lower sides as weakspots.
In the same world where utterly braindead American mains want their tanks to overperform and be utterly indestructible because a majority of them are too stupid to not sit in the open and get killed.

[Maorys12]