T-series, CAS and Pansier overpeforming

It might not, but I don’t like to assume things [if I did with you, which I likely did, you should know why I don’t like to assume things].

My thought process might end up giving inaccurate results, but it’s all I know.
That and practicing how to ask for clarification… that ones only 3 - 5 years old in my 29 years of life, so I forget a lot.

Well i already knew that but still don’t understand why he at people like that?

Nah sorry, You did not just drop I am too strong, alright calm down there tough guy. Bro has me wheezing

You’ve been successfully gaslit into believing you are responding to RazerVon, but it was me, Casino.

1 Like

What an incredibly shameless, uneducated, valueless, uninformative, incorrect, poorly written and outright toxic post.

2 Likes

I will try to be constructive, but, basically:

1- Dimensions. The 62 ton tank is significantly larger in size due to:
-Manual loader (extra crew member) requiring additional space.
-Blowout panel safe ammo racks (except in CR2s) taking up way more space as well.
-More emphasis on crew ergonomycs.
-Larger powerplants with more bigger and complex transmissions (allowing to reverse and neutral steer, for example).

2- Armor style. Since the tank is significantly larger, it needs a more efficient way to cover a larger surface area with effective-enough armor. Thus, advanced composite armors are used in an attempt at making the protection/weight ratio efficient.

On the other hand, Russian tanks:

-Have no blowout panels.
-Have no separate ammo storages.
-Are overall smaller due to having one less crew member to fit in.
-Do not care about crew ergonomycs at all.
-Have tremendously simple transmissions (with all of the disadvantages).
-Since their front surface area is way smaller than NATO tanks’, they don’t need to rely on advanced composite modules to cover larger areas without becoming too heavy; instead, they are just a thick bunch of sloped RHA plates that, in proportion, are significantly less weight-efficient than NATO tanks’ composite modules.
-However, even that would be insufficient on itself, providing equal or less protection values than NATO tanks’ composites; the only reason why their tanks have functional protection levels it’s because they are coated on heavy ERA specifically designed against kinetic threats and which are one-use only. Once you hit a T-90M’s ERA and it’s gone, it becomes just a T-72 that can be easily penetrated on the now ERA-less area, while the composite armor of NATO tanks will retain their effectiveness after multiple hits.

3 Likes

So from the perspective of a German Main:

The Americans are already cannon fodder.

Similar to the French, British, Italians and Israelis.

In my opinion, only the three trees Sweden, Germany and Russia are equal.

Sweden and Germany have the best tanks and if Russia has built up enough SPs for their CAS, that’s where the advantage lies.

Most recently I played in a match with 16 Leos. 10 Leo 2A7V, 2 PL and 4 122BS+.

The enemy, which consisted of Russians and two Brits, didn’t even get a plane into the air.

I can imagine what they thought about the op Leos.

I have US, USRR, GERM, UK, ISREAL, and SWEEDEN top-tier full lineups. Japan is halfway done.

god you are schizofrenic

1 Like

schizophrenic

real

1 Like

BVM copium side armor disagrees.

You mean the armor I’ve never failed to pen… and the ammo I’ve never failed to hit…
The only ammo I’ve had a skill issue hitting is T-72B3’s.
And the only time I don’t pen side armor is cause I missed the side armor of tanks and hit their roof armor, or tracks, a universal trait of all MBTs.

That armor is total bullshit it can eat so many shells in ease, no side armor should be like that.

If you are pointing out my personal stats. I refuse to play Russia, when I do, I play carelessly with the goal of losing the game. I don’t try to do good in Russia, unlike many people I don’t go along with the META nation. I also have Germany leo7 with 290 deaths to 800+ kills and I barely touch that tank. I take the turms to top tier just fo the heck of it. I hope that explains why is a 1/1 kd ratio.

1 Like

That’s some of the biggest load of BS I’ve seen written.

5 Likes

Buddy got 7k battles talking about a guy that got +25k lmao

image
image
image

Compare the amount of games with those 2 nations to my USSR. Most of my T series are not even spaded.

y’all ever farted in a ziplock bag?
oh sorry wrong forum

Bro this entire post was just a person smoking crack or def does not play this game lol

The t90m is on par with m1a2 sep???!!! Lmao in what world? In what bloody world? Is that with its spall liner or how about the turret ring made of paper? Or how about loudest engine noise in the game when for a fact the Americans call the Abram’s the QUIET DEATH because it’s 100 percent quieter then the Russians engines yet in this game it sounds like a an airplane with an afterburner going off at WEP

Thank god the Americans have CAS because it’s all they got and they barely have that anymore the VT1 has a 50g overload and now this insane 30g ground slinger in Japan that you can’t flare or even better love it when china has a z19 up that’s my favorite moment to get blasted out the sky by a ty90

So where in what world is USA on par with Russia in this game in any way? Where in what world is the aim 7m on par with a 27er? Where in what world in War thunder has gaijin literally trying to make the most strongest the most powerful military equipment in the world look like the worst nation in this game? Because gaijin is literally a Russian company owned by a Russian billionaire who’s sole purpose is to make the west look weak and the Russia ever so powerful it’s pathetic how bad USA tanks and planes are in this game! (Forget about the player base of USA) this utter lack of respect towards the USA is downright criminal and they need to be donkey slapped! My favorite part is where they think the west is incapable or making ERA that can only defect 5 to 20mm of kinetic energy specially on the SEP but yet because the source of Relict says 200mm of protection they instantly believe it. As if Russia isn’t notorious for dramatizing their military equipment to be something it def is not when in reality it’s garbage and can’t even beat a third world country.

You sir are a true russki and a statesmen if I ever seen one. NASTROVA COMRADE

3 Likes