on an in-game standpoint it would be the same thing as OFL F1/2 that gaijin added, aka it would either add only a few but incredibly negligible amount of pen or just none (since with their formula OFL F2 is DU but has no more pen then OFL F1)
so practically it would be just another 3BM60, Russia just like Britain is fairly locked in their domestic APFSDS research and technology so it is no surprise their best developed bullet is not anything worth noting among the many
on a funnier note, would be fun to see, just to see the usual whining people call bias a nothingburger just like the 3BM42-2 that changes anything only for a single tank in their entire TT
You are right. Even 3BM59 get into game, it will not become “game changer” and hilarious thing if NATO fans hate it and complaint it every single report titles to show their unsatisfied.
About the newest stock shell that Gaijin given, I see there is no “bias” for Russian while some top tier Western tanks same BR with T-90M such as M1A2 SEP V3, Leopard 2A7HU, Ariete AMV, Lerlerc AZUR, Strv 122B+, Merkava Mk.4M using better penetration stock shells and it just a small “additional” for tier VIII tank T-90M/T-90M ARENA-M. (T-72B3A also in same tier but Gaijin ignored it to show their decision was not a “bias”).
542mm (at 100m) penetration never a high risky with NATO tanks while they face with some “better a lot” shells with no any complaint.
13 threads would probably pop up exactly 2 milliseconds after that happened, claiming the Russian government funds Gaijin and that Putin ordered BVVD to put it in the game to make the T-90M stronger.
BTW both 3BM42-2 and 3BM60 are missing anti-era mechanism but as per usual Gaijin gives a new mechanism to the US then the rest can have one or two years later …
