Finlay Arena-M report has been accepted ( after pending for review for 7 months ) and forwarded to devs. Not a warranty it will get fixed but definitely a step towards the right direction.
3BM60 missing new anti-ERA mechanism report :
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/v8msCeATaETL
Watch people who mostly play nato tanks complain
Btw congrats on getting that arena-m bug being forwarded
I thought I read somewhere about it having an anti-era feature. But looks like they need more info?
NIMI ( literaly the designer ) material explecitely stating anti-ERA capabilites is apparently not enough for some random technical mod … i mean if Gaijin mods know better than the designer of the round who am i to contradict them XD.
Jokes aside if Gaijin doesn’t want to do something there is no way to force them no matter the amount of sources you bring to them. It was the same with Derivatsiya PVO ammo rack , i reported it with multiple primary documentation from KBM , Rostec etc , they denied it then magically after some months changed the model exactly to what my report suggested … go figure .
That’s funny
What’s that device glowing red light on top of the turret?
Convoy light
guys these day I haven’t play the game so not having the T90M arena yet, how was it objectively
It’s what you’d expect from a Russian tank and it’s not much better than the others.
Add armor modification now gaijobiles, salt the snail
woah. is there any possibility this is a t90m2?
yep, I would like to use it instead of B3A
no it’s not one, nor the showcase was for it, its just a T90M with Arena APS and 4S24 relikt metal bags kit
T-90M2 is not production/not in public yet. At least we must wait until the end of 2026 to 2027 to see the true shape and face of T-90M2. People expect it has better gear box and engine took from T-14 and slightly increase the armor. (Hard kill APS ARENA-M also required). Nightmare for Western tanks (in WT) when it can forward and backward same speed: >= 80 km/h (some sources it can gets 90 km/h) while not losing stab.
Was a bug report made?
I wonder what if “Gayjin” gives T-72B3/ T-90M the new APFSDS such as 3BM59 (2A82-1M can using better types of APFSDS because Russians tested some of T-90M equipped this cannon) when DU shells introduced for American for a while (same time introduce M289A4 for American, DM63 and may be DM73 for Germany)?
