T-80UD/BE (T-80UD 478DU-1) Performance & Inaccuracies

I think mod just closed it. Dude is just to lazy to read all evidence supporting the HIT gun. Its his job to read and find inaccuracies, yet he just lable it as bug.

We need to send report on that moderator.

1 Like

image

I’ll consider one more large bug report for the T-80UD/DU-1 whenever I have time and can be asked, the amount of sources I need for one thing is incredibly ridiculous.

4 Likes

another primary source that clearly states Gun Manufacturing Factory
image

just in case someone says this is only for gun barrels:
source


image

2 Likes

shall we try once more?

i believe an updated list of bugs is in order

2 Likes

The information provided by you is pretty good, I’ll make a bug report tomorrow and gather additional information in the mean time. The source you provided also lists the 125mm being the autofrettaged chrome plated which is also listed down for the T-80UD, something which is undeniable.

If you want however, you could gather information from my previous report and information you’ve gathered recently and make your own bug report, or I’ll do it myself tomorrow - either way, it’s very apparent that the upgraded T-80UDs never would’ve used the 2A46M-1.

We also need information of the KBA3 Tank Gun as well, just to put the nail in the coffin and confirm that all Pakistani T-80UDs aren’t fitted with the 2A46M-1 in general, information of the KBA3 Tank Gun is hard to acquire and specifically in Pakistani service, most we can achieve is probably secondary sources.


I’ll also look into the possible usage of the 6TD-II engine on the T-80UD, I’ve found some primary sources discussing it but not specifically mentioning what type of tanks it was fitted on (excluding the Al-Khalid series/VT-1A).

2 Likes

@soviet_MoonMan
might also have info since his first suggestion was about the Pakistani T-80UD with the 6TD-IIE

check out his suggestion and the sources he used as well as the first comment he made

also posting old report link here since older links dont work
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SEElaGVlBtTJ

@kleinerPanzer
also made a report for the gun of the Al Khalid I (named: 125 mm HIT L/48 cannon OR 125 mm Smooth Bore Tank Gun)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9ZJynqpEPSzc

1 Like

Wow, amazing. That can be used to reopen the issue

1 Like

Screenshot_20250202-212056_Chrome
Screenshot_20250202-212004_Chrome
Sejjel APFSDS. x.com

Spoiler

Screenshot_20250202-211927_Chrome
Screenshot_20250202-211821_Chrome
Screenshot_20250202-211759_Chrome

2 Likes

2 Likes

You guys can use this video to prove that HIT produces tank guns.

1 Like

and they show both the al khalid/T-85IIAP and the T-80-UD(BE) so we know both tanks use domestic cannons

Gaijin still hasn’t made the relevant changes, it’s too bad.

It’s an event vehicle, if they didn’t change it in the first week it’ll never change

3 Likes

Bit late but I’ve managed to work up the energy for the T-80UD/DU-1 issue again, I’ve reopened another bug report for it and hopefully it may get accepted in due time.

I’ll keep updating this bug report if I find any additional information on the T-80UD/DU-1s armament and on the 125mm HIT Tank Gun.

2 Likes

Bit late but I’ve managed to work up the energy for the T-80UD/DU-1 issue again, I’ve reopened another bug report for it and hopefully it may get accepted in due time

Yeah I give up gang, the T-80UD/DU-1 is a lost cause lmao - the most insufferable experience known to mankind.

image

image

image

I now understand why classified documents are leaked so often, I hope Gaijin understands that stumbling on information about vehicles still in service isn’t easy.

3 Likes

Don’t frets about that. We all know that Gaijin’s issue area is the most stubborn place in the world, and they may just want to get their hands on confidential documents.

1 Like

I made a new bug report for the model inaccuracies for the T-80UD 478DU-1, this should be a more straightforward procedure as Pakistan has displayed their T-80UD in favourable positions which showcases the inaccuracies with the in-game model.

If this does manage to magically get rejected, I’ll genuinely crashout as it should be as clear as day (I don’t know why I put myself through this lmao)

2 Likes

It is interesting to see the T-72S being mentioned in that brochure despite Pakistan not owning any of that variant… publicly

you already kinda did on the merkavas thread bro

You know HIT offers upgrade packages for other nations.

2 Likes