Russia only has a few units and is not being produced in series, while crew protections seems top noch, its turret has too much crap on it, probably even a 50 cal mg can disable it. Good tank on paper but not practical at all and probably costs alot more than a t90m to produce. And most of its stats are secret anyway so go away we dont need it in this game.
Don’t mention Armata on the forum, neural activation has no treatment. But yes, I’m for it sometime within the next year, I want the funny fire and forget ATGMs.
Like most tanks.
What you described is kinda how you can describe a NATO tanks like KF51 or any other prototype yet people seem so happy to think about them in game until its T-14.
It would be better the T-14 Armata comes first over the prototype units because they’re absurd. What I mean is: T-14 Armata could come into the game when we get equally balanced counterpart as it’s more “balanced” than the prototype ones.
If you suggest the earliest version when the Tank was revealed, I may be wrong but doesn’t change much but the Chassis armor shape.
Yeah the Object 195 is simply gonna be better in game Armata.
As for different shape, it doesnt change anything, armor package inside has the same shape and only ERA module changed it’s shape, which shouldnt matter in game.
Underperforming thats what they are.
They dont loft and top attack right. Most of the time its still a frontal attack if anything
Not mentioning how gajin hard locks the launchers into a position abd you cant use them right
