arguably the same for the T-14, besides that those tanks are a few years into the future, more will be known
Sure that can be said, but as any other tank in service, no matter of amount it will get its tricks told out (like 3BM59 was for example, as well as possible sabot of Vaccuum series), while Abrams X components or armour might as well be used in future projects, meaning it wont just get told out for nothing.
These are 2015 and 2022 vehicles either way, sure there are 2020&2022/2023 vehicles in game, yet these arent the same are PL, 2S38, KF-41.
Spoiler
1 Like
that and Puma are terrible implementation either way, gajin didnt know enough about those vehicles and they got a terrible model that needed to be correctted by the community and awaits implementation
1 Like
Agreed, which is probably why we wont see either discussed in minimum 2 years.
honestly would be more likely that we even could see the not even produced 2A8 yet compared to T-14 Armata, only because the basic leopard is well known and the addition of RWS and APS realy isnt anything all to gigantic
1 Like
Testing its Afganit active protection system
3 Likes
950mm Pen !!! Of course … If the T14 Armata is coming into play, then it is a must to bring the new Panther prototyp with 1500mm pen.
This numbers are approved by noone and only stands on the paper. Also the T14 is no regular and not yet seen in combat. So there are also no really and realistic stats and behaviour about this.
Besides that if you will bring T14 as described here, it is best tank in Pen, best tank in accelaration, best tank in speed and best tank in manouverbility.
So bye bye of last percentage of realistic behaviour.
Any other ideas on that?
Always happy to discuss.
1 Like
With the state of top tier ground being a stompfest hosted by Germany and Sweden with their UFO leos with spall liners, i can see this being added in the march or june 2024 update (with only 3bm59/60)
Ring some bells with new power and leo 2a6 stompfest? Then BVM came and the proper order according to gaijin was restored :)))
1 Like
Honestly with the whole debacle that is the T-14 Armata project and its origins I don’t think its wise to give credibility to a design that hasn’t been proven conceptually at all. I mean the whole design is innovative in that its a put together of innovative concepts, but its not new and its just constantly being crapped on. Like we are still arguing about the engine problems and what about the design (electronics, engine, etc.) is apparently making it so hard to produce. I think they should at least take a while to figure out the design in game than to rush it through. I’m completely of the opinion that the T-14 Armata as it stands is really only equal to something like the 2a7V with DM63/73 than being something much more game changing.
I think from all the supposed mythos they tried to create with the idea of T-14 Aramata is what helped prove that it was nothing special
1 Like
armata is only slightly superior to the latest leo and abrams variants tbh, against the abramsX, kf51, etc it’s no match
More equivalent to the M1 TTB, with some advantage being almost 40 years newer with ammunition and frontal hull armor probably
One of those people bias against Russia again. The Armata moved after a couple of minutes later. Bro thinks he is smart, knows everything and listens to some random youtuber’s propaganda smh.
1 Like
+1 for me but in far future. Should come with other Prototypes such as KF51, EMBT, AbramsX etc.
Size comparison to other main battle tanks
-7 or -8 gun depression?
Structure of the T-14 Armata
I do believe that the T-14 Armata can be added to the USSR TT, and i don’t see any problems of why it shouldn’t be added. well i do said that it would be nice to be added to the game, it is just a matter of when, because if gaijin would add this vehicles ASAP, then it would be unfair to other nation.
so in short, my suggestion for future updates at top tier Ground RB, i think Gaijin should take it slow, they should add a more older vehicles but add something new element to it, like the use of APS systems in top tier Ground RB like the M1A2 SEP V2 / V3, Leopard 2a7, T90M Provy first before they add a more newer stuff in the tech tree, especially for the major nation.
again, while it is great if they added the T-14, but i think they should take it slow
1 Like
reverse speed?
Iirc It goes as fast in reverse as it does forward.
So, 80 km/h (50 mph), there was some sources claiming it could go 90 km/h, but that’s at full engine output.
2 Likes
And when there are so much interesting and unique vehicle in lower ranks waiting to be added, top br copy paste should be slower now.
1 Like
wdym unfair they added the challenger 3 before it even entered service
4 Likes
Unknown.
However it’s most likely that the Transmission used for the T-14 is similar if not identical to the one used on the Object 195. Which is believed to have used the same Transmission as the Object 187. And it has 6 forward and 2 reverse gears.
So if have to pull some numbers out of my Ass. The T-14 probably has a “Max Reverse Speed” of 12 to 24 Km/h
Объект 187, вариант 6. Обновлённая… | War Thunder Blog (vk.com)
2 Likes