And a giant pile of armour… Perfectly fine of being 0.3 going to 0.7 below that Leopard. And the same BR as the M60 which trades all of that armour for some mobility and a faster reload.
LMAO you can’t be serious. At 8.3 it only faces APDS and HEAT that don’t care about its armor. Unless you’re facing a Maus your armor is completly useless. I have not bounced a single shot yet. Im guessing you’re talking about the M60A1 AOS which is 0.3 lower but has less than half the reload of the T-10M. The M60A1 RISE is 0.3 higher but has APFSDS and ERA all around the tank thats actually effective against HEAT unlike the T-10M “giant pile of armor”.
1 Like
It should be me asking you if you’re serious.
Your poll even reflects the general disagreement with your opinion. Its a PITA to fight against even with heat.
barely anything below it can pen it
2 Likes
This sounds like someone coping
The T-10M has a great gun, good mobility for its weight, insane roofmounted and coaxial gun and good armour.
1 Like
I also need to add how youre angry at this tank being bad while having a K/D of 1.3.
You have yet to tell me what WW2 it would face that aren’t the 3 I listed above. Also please tell me against what tanks the armor can protect.
There are a total of 6 tech tree vehicles from 7.3 to 8.3 that can’t penetrate it. Everything except for 6 vehicles else is not “barely anything”.
T32, T32E1, Ho-Ri Production, Chart 25t, Lorraine 40t, AMX-50 (TOA100)
Not including SPAA obviously
How does personal K/D play a role here? At least compare it to other high BR heavies.1.3K/D in the T-10M compared to 3.0K/D in the Maus. So is the Maus too strong at 7.7 or is the T-10M too weak at 8.3? K/D doesn’t matter when looking at the capabilities of a tank.
It clearly shows that youre not performing overwhelmingly bad in the vehicle. Infact its overall stats are pretty good.
Thunderskill stats aren’t accurate and almost all tanks there are listed with a 1+ K/D which is statistically impossible. If there are vehicles that have a K/D of >1 there need to be some with a K/D >1 but there are practically none. In fact the average K/D in ground vehicles would be below 1 due to planes and J out. Don’t use Thunderskill to prove a point.
Also I have a negative K/D in the Tiger 1E does that mean it should get downtiered because im doing bad in that vehicle?
It’s a superheavy, albeit with designed closer to a proper MBT than any of the other superheavies.
It’s better that the vehicle is slightly weak than to accidentally overtune it too much and have it run a BR range, and with superheavies slight adjustments are prone to doing just that.
That’s overall stats. Personal stats are generally accurate and are the point he is making.
Why would the T-10M ruin 7.0 to 8.0? There are almost no 7.0 vehicles all this would do is prevent it seeing 9.3. The T-10A and Conqueror terrorize 6.7 and nobody cares. What vehicle are at risk here? Name a few examples please.
No the picture he use are the overall stats. “Infact its overall stats are pretty good.”
Ah wait, my bad, I only noticed the first message using thunderskill.
9.3 means less now cause it’s just all worse vehicles after the changes.
At 9.3 there are still many vehicles with mobility, APFSDS, laser rangefinder and often thermal sights. Examples: Class 3P, Rooikat (all of its variants), Type 16, PTL02/WMA301, Centauro 105, VRCC and a lot of MBTs like the Leopard 1A5s or the Merkavas that also have thermals. The T-10M is too slow and the reload is too long to fit the 8.0+ meta.
You just mentioned the T-10a being a menace, which is a vehicle I use regularly to club 6.7 and acknowledged it does just that.
The T-10M is a better T-10, and it is slightly weak, but fine at 8.3, maybe the better question would be should the T-10A and comparable vehicles go to 8.0.