They do not need a heavy tank tho. Not every nation needs to have one.
The only thing that gets me even slightly upset in reality on this forum is dealing with people like yourself who will drag something out all day so they can feel better about themselves.
You really don’t want them getting something German
The bought and used it and it fills a gap
That is all that is needed
3 Likes
we are not saying add the king tiger 2 instead of many many many tanks, we are saying add the king tiger 2 be cause that’s LITERALLY the only option available and sweden needs it for the next reasons:
lack of good tanks in 6.7 (like literally I’d be satisifed with a mediocare lineup) but 6.7 sweden barely has anything other then the charioteer that is basically a comet 1 body in 6.7 with a better gun.
3 Likes
I can spot 3 viable vehicles at a glance on the tech tree?
not to mention these are notable as well
oh yeah a tank destroyer that barely has armor and mobility and basically a hitting practice target, with a PBV 501 that has No armor, and finally the charioteer which is less than a mediocer medium tank, and the STRV 74 that isn’t even 6.7 (yet he wants me to bring it to 6.7 that can get up tiers to 7.7)
1 Like
i didn’t want to mention the Lvkv 42 be cause…lol.
1 Like
does anyone have an idea when the update can drop? its Ben more than a week since the dev stream.
bkan is fantastic going by how many times I die to it compared to the other SPGs at the same BR, and I also really like playing objectively worse SPGs at that same rough BR like the G6 or debatedly the M109.
Oh nevermind, all you’re saying is “no armor” like that matters lol, I was gonna talk about the rest.
Sweden has a viable lineup there, you just don’t like it.
I will say this though, being a specific BR means nothing regarding uptierability. I see the STRV 74 has ammo that can be used to penetrate 7.7 tanks so I’m going to go on a limb and say it can probably be used as a last resort backup just like most other minor nations do. I’m speaking from experience of using say, the BTR-80A well past its “intended” BR of 7.3.
Lvkv, like the other SPAA similar to it, is a good backup at these BRs. Using it intelligently can get you a lot of flanking kills.
the strv 74 can kill any 11.7 SPAA, does this mean it should be moved to 11.7 as a last resort?
I don’t believe I talked about it moving to 11.7
but that’s your logic
It would be if you took all of the nuance out of my statement, yes.
Reality: What I’m saying is that there is a viable 6.7 lineup there and I would myself use those vehicles mentioned if I was playing sweden at that BR. It does not mean to stay the strv74 is OPTIMAL to use at 6.7, which is why I said it is a last resort backup, but not even including these two backup vehicles you have 3 perfectly competitive vehicles at 6.7 which is fine regarding the lineup. I use the BTR-80A at much higher BRs than 7.3 as I said before, because of its ability to be uptiered and stay relevant. I imagine the strv74 is similar with its APDS
Have you ever touched the Bkan or Strv-74? I can tell you for a fact that “glass cannon” only applies to vehicles with actual cannons.
The Bkan somewhat has a cannon, but instead of being a glass tank it’s now the size of an average American 1970s home.
1 Like
*other than Germany.
Minor error.
I figured.
1 Like
There you have it :D
And comparing Kranvagn to Tiger II is like comparing Tiger II to IS-10M. Come on man!