In all honesty the people in this forum that are strongly disagreeing with what is currently a single non in house manufactured tank being added for the case of a “balanced” line up should actually provide a vehicle that can be added instead of just effectively saying “no”. At that rate you are no longer having a debate/conversation, you are just being disagreeable and argumentative for the sake of being so, kinda defeats the purpose of having an opinion when that itself is based on a clear bias, which you are ignoring when stating that everyone else that is for the addition is biased themselves…
For the case of Sweden due to their actual history the only “tanks” built in and around the same time that the Tiger II was made that aren’t already in the game, for comparisons sake were literally lightly armoured transport trucks or a light tank with a damn machine gun for its main armament, not really something that can be added to the game with the clear conscious of “balance” actually meaning anything.
i like how other people complain about the fact that,“not all nations should get lineups and top tier planes bro” then why japan got the F16AJ? why germany has rank 6 7 and 8? why italy is getting a gripen C? why the Uk is getting gripen C too?
Then I guess the conversation ends at “if they didn’t have it in service it’s not gonna happen”, Sweden will be the first TT in the game to outright stop having vehicles added to its ground tree between rank 4 - rank 8. /s
You know, until Gaijin can get the info for the new generation of tanks that are still actively being made and are classified. Which in turn are actually top tier vehicles that are completely irrelevant to the current conversation.
But Swedish mains ask for the world to kow-tow to them you know. /s
Absolutely not. There no argument to be made for Sweden to get a King Tiger; Israel and Japan are more lacking across the board and i don’t see them getting random vehicles for the sake of gameplay.
“Buh S w e d e n doesn’t has a proper 6.7 lineup” Well, Israel doesn’t has a light tank between 8.0 and 11.7
Also correct, and they should get a more fleshed out TT, I entirely agree.
To be fair I don’t think anyone that thinks the Tiger II should go to Sweden also thinks that other trees shouldn’t be more fleshed out, I wanna play both France and Israel but as their trees currently are I don’t wanna invest my time into them as I don’t find either fun.
(Although in Frances case it’s due to the obscenely bad BR placement for their mid tier vehicles)
However as this is a discussion about the tiger II the conversation has been about that, I’m sure there are other chats for those two issues as well and I would like for them to be fixed too.
You fail to see the point. Sweden is the biggest offender of getting random vehicles to fill their needs (Mi28A, T-80U, AHS, VIDAR or the copy-paste finnish line); they don’t deserve more of that (not at least when there are nations in a worse state)
as i am seeing israel have very good Lineups accross all BR’s
Lmao. Magach+Merkavas and nothing else (if you only play ground), VERY GOOD lineups.
and 6.7 isn’t the only BR sweden is lacking in, 4.0-4.7 also
All nations have gaps (even the big ones), there nothing wrong with it. Japanese TT proved that-even with massive gaps- a TT can be fun if the developers care to add good vehicles/diversity.
reasons to add copy paste in other nations: they need it
did sweden fill that requirement? yes.
then this tank shall be added. don’t start saying they got this they had that gaijin did this, be cause if we were talk about copy paste like this then the most of the following ranks in germany shouoldn’t exist be cause they got so many copy paste that is more then sweden by tens of times: rank 6-7-8 german air.
This but 100000% unironically
Sweden gets new content almost every update, I’m sure they can go 1 update without “”“”“”“”“new”“”“”“”“”“” copy paste that just takes away from other nations