Can you please make it very clear what exactly your point in this thread is
(https://forum.warthunder.com/t/too-bad-this-isnt-carried-as-a-stat-maybe-it-should/45226)
You encourage assumption and dismissal of anything that doesn’t match your precious ‘standards’.
Honestly, I think you should almost just be removed from the forum as all you do is FEED this whinge and moan, and make players blind to ANY solution, just because it’s too hard…
Literally…
Your name says it all, and your angles on the constant show it.
Just like those deathpics that show you up near spawn, and dying to big things that can also be dealt with without affecting those precious stats.
Effective is a thing that doesn’t NEED your stats, but you ignore that so much so that it’s your true flaw.
calling for censorship because you disagree?
2 Likes
I encourage people checking if what others are saying is true. If You don’t understand that without this way of thinking, flatearthers would rule the world, then You are lost.
If You want to say that something is good/effective, prove it. If You can’t then You are lying, EOT.
Flagging me now, because You can’t handle the truth? You really showed Your true colors.
1 Like
Calling for more active moderation to avoid abuse and insults being the only methods of engagement that this clown sees…
Not what you’re doing. You’re also part of this problem currently. Don’t cry for censorship please.
2 Likes
It doesn’t need to kill to be effective… Hence why I said to google deterrent…
It’s a VERY missed term and tactic that SPAA actually have up thier sleave, but because you’re fixated on stats, you missed that point, hence why I said you couldn’t even bring up the points I made in your urge to keep throwing the old KDR nonsense around…
Correct but very few SPAA in WT are effective by deterrence.
2 Likes
So You are going to scare it away from certain area and it will kill Your teammates in other are, great.
1 Like
Maybe you should look at the start of the issue compared to just judging it to be me because you don’t like what I say sometimes…
ULQ is the one making out that stats are the be all end all, making out that ‘someone’ is inferior to validate thier stance…
All I was saying was that SPAA had a literal purpose…
It went through so many points about the usage of said role, to solely come back time and time again that my stats weren’t good enough for them.
Quite telling to be real.
Playing SPAA a lot myself I can confidently say that if used correctly, it is effective.
1 Like
He doesn’t care for that, and he’s SOLELY going on the KDR of me overall as to whether I can even SAY it… That’s how pathetic his points are, that you’re backing up by merely saying that I’m the issue…
If the “other area” has no other player covering his team, this is bad luck, but the area with the SPAA player would be protected. Nobody says that one SPAA alpne can block the entire sky.
Nah, I am not reading 340 posts to find context.I scrolled up a reasonable amount, found no context really, then asked you. You then proceeded to literally ignore my request to be brought up to date on this in favor of engaging in the shit slinging match with ULQ.
Nah, even out of the area… Those around you are actually running a risk…
Nope. It isn’t. Not in your hands nor in anybody elses’. Hard limited by how ineffective they are at various BRs. Some SPAA is good, most is bad.
2 Likes
You are the issue. You are using inflammatory language and calling for censorship. ULQ might also be an issue but I didn’t read the last 20 posts and see him calling for censorship
“When it comes to SPAA I have already talked in different topics that it is hard to see if someone is doing well in SPAA because on the ground You also have tanks that You need to think about. (If You want to, I can dig it out).”
“Coming back to SPAA talk, if someone is really going to say that they are effective, I would like to see that effectivnes in something other than just words. After overpressure mechanic was implemented and guided missles got nerfed, I have played air vechicles and have seen how it affected their performence and how ineffective they have become compared to new armament which was added for the air. One can argue that the nerf for guided weaponary also affected the air, but by flying the heli I know that it is much harder for SPAA to hit moving target than from heli perspective to destroy the said SPAA (if someone would argue that You should try to move with SPAA, then oh boy, try it and see how Your missle will never really hit the target ((not talking about people flying in straight line or hovering))).”
Someone needs to read.
So SPAA is effective because in 500m radius from it, it can defend a teammate from a plane if an air player doesn’t have proper loadout?
2 Likes
Just look at how eager ULQ is looking for support by liking ANYTHING that tries to validate his stances, because it’s only them that insta likes anything going against those who they’re not liking…
2 Likes
So now likes of posts that I agree with or just made me chuckle are bad?
I can just guess who is flagging all my posts here.
1 Like