@noister Do you know the Supercruise speed w/ Izd. 177?
No
1 Like
Pack it up, it’s not a jet made for war.
1 Like
Wdym jet, it isn’t even a jet lmao
It uses 2 of those kerosene steam table fans straight from the 19th century
It’s a gen -694206767 jet clearly much behind in time
6 Likes
It’s clearly an object made to fit in a kids park, forget the slides and allat.
Some might say fossil
1 Like
End of 2 years ago, if we’re thinking about the same thing. 2 aircraft of the 23Dec24 batch were sent off for private tests.
Is that just a decoy for missiles?
Looks to me the Unmanned Manned Aircraft teaming projects are going well if the two seaters are being built though it will likely do the classics two seater aircraft are expected to but the idea of drone fighters require a command plane to work. From what I read China and Russia from tests think a two seater is a need for drone command but the USA does not at this time (no two seater F-35 - F-22 outside of some Photoshop). From the USA companies making these drones from the sales material they don’t seem to believe a twin seat stealth fighter is coming anytime soon so there sales point is ease of use for a single pilot.
the Su-57 has also been used in tandem with the S-70 UAV before the first flight of the Su-57D
PS: love your username, zeon were the good guys :)
1 Like
Yes one man pilot can handle the work of controlling a UAV but its not ideal the S-70 seems to be a bit of a attack platform so it may be okay. The Decal of the twin seater had the S-70 on it with some other drone there are also the Chinese drones which look to be more of a fighter then strike drone also all the fighters China has modified into drones. There is also the fact automating a plane is much more easier apparently then a car as planes are basically automated already. Fighter planes with there software can tell friendly aircraft apart from enemy adding more sensors is something that can be done to provide better situational awareness then just a pilot. AAM missiles are basally a very simple version of this sensor input to action output. Ground drones that think have to deal with so much more data that its hard to automate them with every situation human brains have the same issue with information overload we always simplify our surroundings so you can overlook very basic things like who is friendly or not which way something is moving. AI powered loitering munitions have the same issue around targeting as dazzling camo is back in style trying to mess up the targeting data not really a new issue though. The Survivability onion works better it seems on the ground then in the air concerning AI everyone is kind of equal. Drones need human input no matter what for tactical input (go here, defend this area, stop what you are doing, help defend the command plane!)
funny quote about AI “Any AI that is to be trusted with weapons capable of killing hundreds, needs to be so intelligent that it cannot be trusted at all”
The solution is simple give it to a AI that you don’t trust :-) therefore you can trust it to never work against you B1 battle droids in Star Wars make perfect sense then don’t they lol.
Spoiler
Zeon Zum Deikun was a visionary to bad he had a heart attack thank God the Zabi’s carry his flame :-) nothing can go wrong right?
One of them
su-57 itself has a kill on the S-70 lol
1 Like
I’m guessing India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia(you never know with them) and maybe Belarus.
Maybe also Iran? Considering they buying newer russian military hardware
Don’t forget the possibility of it simply being marketing lies :v
Su-57 uses HMD right?
Someone sent me this, and there seems to be a lack of HMD.
Only T-50-4 tested hmd if I rmb correctly, have not heard anything else about HMD on production felon but I think it has something to do with Russian pilots preferring hud over hmd but I am lacking the source for this
1 Like