Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

3D TVC was the F-15 ACTIVE program

s/n 71-0291 does seem kind of off since it was an F-15E prototype and i dont think it ever had the TVC, image probably fake

1 Like

here’s an image of it with 2d tvc, but this was all after 1988. this is 71-0290, the other 2d thrust vectoring image posted earlier is fake, 71 0291 NEVER had thrust vectoring


image
definitely a painting or something

1 Like

Source which seem to claim 1980s says 1990 as first 2D TVC flight.
Wayback Machine

Spoiler

AHHHHHH 405.

1 Like

that seems a bit too late for its impact on the ATF program YF-22 was being made in 1990

Well I mean the other one was 1988, also, the project was 1970s, which suggests it did have an impact, but as the focus was F16 F18 and F15 it was perhaps an upgrade attempt.

Me too. It seems that information is incorrect. Perhaps there was confusion with the X-29, which was indeed tested in the first half of the 1980s.

F-15B 71-0291 is pretty cool being the F-15E prototype and having that green livery, they should add it ngl. maybe along with a Soviet prototype of similar era

Wayback Machine
This link, the information is wrong as the 1980s test was just a wind tunnel thing.

I know but I’ve also had convos here with people who got angry when someone called a Su-35S “Su-35” because they considered that only the early one with canards and stuff could be called so
So now I’m confused when someone refers to a canardless flanker as “Su-35”

What?

That has canards??

iam just blind on both eyes

all the Su-27M airframes and prototypes have canards

happy 405

image
you’re not

i didnt see the canards on the image i sent

i was saying that not all of them had canards

yeah, it’s at an angle where they hide pretty well, but you can see the lerx is not the same as the canard less flanker’s lerx

they do all have them

405405405405405405 (meant to reply to ron’s message)

why would they need canarads for that?
the base su-27 was already considered super manouverable to some extend and was so impressive at the time that people were analyzing its performance at the paris airshow

russia does something similar to what the US did so they must have been copying the US

please remind me why the US started to develop and pushed HOBS IR missiles into service
please tell me why the US started to develop the AIM-174 and AIM-260

please tell me why the US started to put more funding into the F-15 programm and why it looks very similar to this guy:

i guess the soviets had a time machine to travel into the future to make worse copies of american tech

4 Likes

The canards for the Su-27M first emerged in 1982 and were to be mounted on the neck, above the LERX, completely different from any american project
They were then moved back on the LERX in 1985, turning into the configuration seen on the Su-33, Su-27M, J-15 and so on

1982 config

1 Like

nah they put canards on their plane, which the US was also experimenting with

so they clearly copied the US

1 Like

yeah, right, cuz they can’t experiment on their own, TsAGI is just a smokescreen for intel work :)

gotta love it
image

1 Like

exactly the soviets would rather invent a time machine than doing their own aerodynamic research