I really hope they fix the Su-30SM model soon.
Specifically all the pylons being non-removable. it gets annoying to look at in custom duels.
Oh man you should look at the threads popping up🙏🏻
“Players losing faith in Gaijin” cause a rwr report got passed, I can’t man.
4 Likes
Gaijin could steal Irbis and AL-41F-1S from SM2 and people would still be mad
2 Likes
Remove the jet entirely🙏🏻
1 Like
Remove everything past Su-27S entirely and put it at 14.0 because this is “realistic”
They could remove those, NOT add in the extra CMs, and people would still call it the best jet in the game and call for it to be nerfed into the ground.
1 Like
The R-77-1’s seeker performance could potentially be improved beyond its current state. Multiple sources suggest it actually has a range of over 20km, meaning the R-77-1 might be able to lock onto enemies from much further away than currently configured.
Looks inside…
“missilery.info” …
If I made a site, Missiles.Gunjob.com and had a page where I had a similar table would that be credible? No it wouldn’t. Third party websites are useless materials for sourcing.
8 Likes
Yes.
Because I love and trust you, Gunjob.
7 Likes
am I being too naughty?
It’s more your trying to impart an air of credibility to a random 3rd party website. Sources for missile performance should come from a operating countries MOD or the manufacturer, secondary materials like printed works are accepted but I’d expect a much lower level of success from such materials.
Not naughty no, just consider the sourcing guidelines on the CBR, you’d quickly see that site would never be accepted.
1 Like
Where can I support money-wise🙏🏻
4 Likes
Please buy it, it’s only 9.6k it’s 100% worth it… I’m sure everyone here is willing to support you financially
1 Like
That site gives nice insight on missiles, but generally has some misinfo, its better to validate their sources used
Where
Thread got nuked, no can do :/
Trash misinformation.
Fuck these retards
Chill man
1 Like