Well it will certainly suffer with that low amount of countermeasures.
I like the rest of the kit tho, 10 ARH without limitations and an ESA radar to go along with, airframe is good enough from what I could test, it’s no rocketship, but at the right alt and with a good old flank it gets up to speed.
Not 14.7 worthy as of now, no.
If it had a regular flanker CM amount and maybe a PL-12A that either has a better seeker or a longer booster it would be 14.7 worthy.
Atp just give it base pl12 and put it at 14.3.
Could also remove the double pylon to be more reasonable for 14.3
So, what should we say? For the future, so we don’t need to use they for you? Unless of course they is your actual pronoun
why we got an export model in this?
He is the way to go
I’ll just use “it” from now on, for safety. /j
Because gaijin logic
If they are adding irbis to su30sm2 bevause mkk had it, it should be irbis e
I think it’s simpler, they just don’t have any sources on N035 so they are rolling with N035E
there is no info about n035
its still secret as all soviet late radars
pro guys know they differ, but dev is not even a layman and understand only direct numerals
They’re also just weird about naming conventions tbf, but it’s not that they “just don’t have any sources”…
it’s the fact that all of the actually reasonable sources point to it using N011M-R/AL-31FP, which would require gaijin to back peddle which they HATE…
@kizvy the message disappeared
Pretty much set for the J-15, on my way to the J-10C.
Also as a big M2K fan I’ll get the “chinese” one too
I’m enjoying this Re-Name mod quite a lot, details on statcards and actual names for vehicles feels really authentic.
iam pretty sure that someone told me that i dont need to make a report with those imgaes bc there already was one
i was dumb and didn’t realize it was for the radar ACM mode and not IRST (the old report)
Though considering this one still isn’t implemented after a year I doubt the IRST one will go anywhere as well
So what does this change?
smaller deadzones
