They’re also just weird about naming conventions tbf, but it’s not that they “just don’t have any sources”…
it’s the fact that all of the actually reasonable sources point to it using N011M-R/AL-31FP, which would require gaijin to back peddle which they HATE…
@kizvy the message disappeared
Pretty much set for the J-15, on my way to the J-10C.
Also as a big M2K fan I’ll get the “chinese” one too
I’m enjoying this Re-Name mod quite a lot, details on statcards and actual names for vehicles feels really authentic.
iam pretty sure that someone told me that i dont need to make a report with those imgaes bc there already was one
i was dumb and didn’t realize it was for the radar ACM mode and not IRST (the old report)
Though considering this one still isn’t implemented after a year I doubt the IRST one will go anywhere as well
So what does this change?
smaller deadzones
I wonder if it’s gonna be like spo-15
where it gives you launch warning for angles above 30 degrees elevation, but no directional sector.
Like you can hear the rwr blaring at you, but not see the actual threat on the rwr.
I really hope they fix the Su-30SM model soon.
Specifically all the pylons being non-removable. it gets annoying to look at in custom duels.
Oh man you should look at the threads popping up🙏🏻
“Players losing faith in Gaijin” cause a rwr report got passed, I can’t man.
Gaijin could steal Irbis and AL-41F-1S from SM2 and people would still be mad
Remove the jet entirely🙏🏻
Remove everything past Su-27S entirely and put it at 14.0 because this is “realistic”
They could remove those, NOT add in the extra CMs, and people would still call it the best jet in the game and call for it to be nerfed into the ground.
The R-77-1’s seeker performance could potentially be improved beyond its current state. Multiple sources suggest it actually has a range of over 20km, meaning the R-77-1 might be able to lock onto enemies from much further away than currently configured.
Looks inside…
“missilery.info” …
If I made a site, Missiles.Gunjob.com and had a page where I had a similar table would that be credible? No it wouldn’t. Third party websites are useless materials for sourcing.
