NSCI would be goated with IRBIS with those azimuth limits. Also even basic HMD functionality wouldn’t hurt in sim
That opens the door to adding virtually anything.gaijin wouldve to completely make up specs without the usual illusion of realism
Belarus SM2 does have trackers, it seems. You can see them istalled on the mounts that are empty on the Russian SM2. This shit probably differs from airframe to airframe, looking at all this.
This door was never closed.
2 Likes
Gaijin wants to maintain that illusion however snd R77m would break that completely
Well, personally I don’t really care if 77M will hit live eventually (it probably would with Su-57, otherwise Russia will have stealth aircraft without stealth because 77-1 can’t be carried internally). Russia still gonna have very competitive R-37M missile.
Assuming stealth will not be useless. (I would put money it will)
1 Like
every missile above 77-1 is pretty competitive
all I want for now is 7° half sens for every top missile, im tired of only mica having it
Where did you get this idea ?
Wdym above?, currently r77-1 is the best missile ingame on the su30sm2
Even 7° is too high, notching micas is too easy still
Check Su-57 thread. I think kizvy posted Su-57 loadout there and Izd 170-1 only placed at external pylons
good ragebait bro
I dont mean mica alone i mean that even notching a mica is too easy, all missiles should be very hard to notch
He was talking about base r77 not 77-1
If you keep the Rafales scan on target, you easily maintain over 70% accuracy, where is the ‘easy’ in that? I mean, if you use a complete moron as your baseline then anything in this game is easy to do. Theres a reason why every single top fragger is abusing the Rafale right now
2 Likes
Su30sm2 is plain better than rafale right now
