https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Rpzh77DDbthJ
got a proper source now


Goddamit, entire cockpit is wrong again! We need to bug report is ASAP!
first ppl need to click on this report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lzVwJiWv7mRp


interesting thing is that some of the 30SM also feature new HUD. This is the one from documentary about SM2 but you can see that it lacks leading edge antennas, as well as SM2 distinct second antenna behind the cockpit and on the chin, so it is definitely Su-30SM
and it aslo doesn’t have Sura installed on it (or NSTS-T since this is post 2015 and Sura was removed from Russian aircrafts)
Probably su30sm that came out of production post 2014 sanctions? Therefore no more Thales HUD.
Number is blurred so you can’t trace it. Could either be post sanctions or after the maintenance.
NSTS-T uses different trackers from sura
it uses 3 of them and they should be in different positions in the cockpit from the sura trackers


Interesting. No info on where the are suppose to be?
sadly not
(without reading the whole patent) it seems like it dosent matter to much where the trackers are placed as long as the spacing is correct
This one seems to be not NSTS-T tho? Patent states it as indication system.
KRET specifically says that it has 2 trackers
mb i switched the NSTS-T and the NCSI up
NSCI would be goated with IRBIS with those azimuth limits. Also even basic HMD functionality wouldn’t hurt in sim
That opens the door to adding virtually anything.gaijin wouldve to completely make up specs without the usual illusion of realism
This door was never closed.
Gaijin wants to maintain that illusion however snd R77m would break that completely
Well, personally I don’t really care if 77M will hit live eventually (it probably would with Su-57, otherwise Russia will have stealth aircraft without stealth because 77-1 can’t be carried internally). Russia still gonna have very competitive R-37M missile.
Assuming stealth will not be useless. (I would put money it will)





