I remember lol.
I think that they look super cool. But for Sim… it’s rather sub optimal.
I remember lol.
I think that they look super cool. But for Sim… it’s rather sub optimal.
Gaijin should’ve also include curtains in deployed position for the sake of the meme
@kizvy Should we make a report about Su-30SM2 having an HMS despite it not being installed in the cockpit?
or maybe just maybe report the things for the hms missing

Naaah, first of all (let me be a gaijin bug report manager) you posted Su-35 cockpit, not Su-30SM2. Second of all - Russian bias, SM2 too stronk, pls nerf.
[DEV] Artifical horizon not working on high/top tier russian planes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/khnx4fYSFd81
[DEV] HMS symbology disapears when looking at a locked target
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lzVwJiWv7mRp
got a proper source now


Goddamit, entire cockpit is wrong again! We need to bug report is ASAP!
first ppl need to click on this report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lzVwJiWv7mRp


Probably su30sm that came out of production post 2014 sanctions? Therefore no more Thales HUD.
Number is blurred so you can’t trace it. Could either be post sanctions or after the maintenance.
NSTS-T uses different trackers from sura
it uses 3 of them and they should be in different positions in the cockpit from the sura trackers


Interesting. No info on where the are suppose to be?
sadly not
(without reading the whole patent) it seems like it dosent matter to much where the trackers are placed as long as the spacing is correct
This one seems to be not NSTS-T tho? Patent states it as indication system.
mb i switched the NSTS-T and the NCSI up