Ron aldo_23
7 Likes
also this right here is also annoying
“it has totally be proven, trust me, i dont need to show any proof”
Ok, you missed the joke. I was talking about the guy from Donuts server that was mentioned in F-5 video
1 Like
If you want actual sources you can check the dedicated thread I mentioned, I’m not gonna serve just because you dont believe.
Wanna prove otherwise? Then burden is on you to investigate and debunk it.
Jeez…
thats just not true
you made a claim
the burden of proof for that claim lies on you
sure
F-20 programm was canceled before the amraam entered service
Additional air-to-air capabilities include track-while-scan and provisions for AIM-7 continuous wave illumination.
Frichtel, J., “AN/APG-67 Multimode Radar Development Program,” SAE Technical Paper 841453, 1984
841453 : AN/APG-67 Multimode Radar Development Program - SAE International
why only mention the AIM-7 when the more advanced AIM-120 was an option
not even this brochure from 2007 mentions ARH missiles
Wayback Machine
I already mentioned my source while you showed me nothing.
Also I couldn’t give a “k” about if you’re getting annoyed or not and I’m not gonna hold your hand to guide to that thread.
You can either check the thread to see if I’m wrong or not or you can just keep it silent.
…
Datalink missiles? So that would be aim 120 no? Aim7p isn’t used for land based air craft so I can’t see any other missile fitting that description
Yeah editing your post while I’m typing doesn’t exactly match the current situation does it?
a2g missiles
the radar has quite a few A2G modes
and why mention SARH missiles specifically but not ARH missiles
1 Like
But it literally says Semi-Active and datalink, not active
Maybe it’s because during that time amraam wasn’t tested on this platform so they didn’t bother to include to a project page that was already cancelled?
Have you ever considered that or its just too hard for you?
Anyway once I’m done with work and come back to home I will check the dedicated thread once again.
so you didnt even look at the brochure or at the AN/APG-67
the radar is used in the korean T-50
Oh you mean the brochure that mentions about how this radar was designed for TigerShark? Yea I read that.
And?
“provisons for BVR missiles”
“Additional air-to-air capabilities include track-while-scan and provisions for AIM-7 continuous wave illumination.”
841453 : AN/APG-67 Multimode Radar Development Program - SAE International
"radar is fully integrated […] with Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles (semi-active and data link.)
the AIM-7 is considered a BVR missile
and if this is your “proof” that the F-20 can carry the AMRAAM, then i have some news for you
https://web.archive.org/web/20041017221958/http://www.rusarm.ru/products/af/mig29smt.htm
well guys it is proven the mig-29smt should have the amraam
Why do you want to nerf SMT even more? 😭
well the Mig-29SMT uses MIL-STD-1553B
meaning you can integrate any NATO missile onto it
the AMRAAM was just an example
so IRIS-T for the Mig-29SMT is confirmed /s
its 2026, half of the game is filled with fan fiction loadouts and vehicle mods and people are still arguing about not being realistic.
3 Likes
Should=/ Can
There is a huge difference between those words but I assume you’re having hard time to understand that.
so you are rather going for ad hominem and an obvious joke statment than trying to prove the actual point wrong