Im pretty sure the N001 can’t detect a target in TWS over 50km, I think using TWS HDN increases it to like 70km if I remember correctly
1 Like
oh thanks didnt know that.
also a other question, i have some trouble where the radar, in tws, wont change vertical and i need to change it manualy. is it suppose to do that ?
Yeah that’s another thing with the N001 it doesn’t follow the target vertically when when a target is TWS softlocked unlike other radar sets, so you will have to use the manual controls a lot more
well
thanks
Radar on Su-30MKK can detect targets in TWS mode up to 80kms while in TWS HDN mode it can detect them up to 100kms without any issue.
As soon as I start the game I can pick up targets from 80+Km’s in MKK if they are in radar range.
really ? i cant even detect past 50km. as soon as the target get past 50km, it show up in my radar.
2 Likes
Bro has the N001 PERO or something instead of the normal N001VE like everyone else bruh
1 Like
Same here
What is even the difference between those versions
To me they all look the same
IRL there are some differences between the N001 versions that are featured in WT, in game it’s mostly only how many DL channels they have that’s important some have longer range in their stat card but practically it’s the same on all
Hello everyone
Since the SM2 is using the Irbis radar shouldn’t it ping as S35 on the RWR display? Unless it uses the very same frequency as the Bars radar
Most likely but irbis is an evaluation of bars so it might also be same.
Makes me Wonder if we have all the modern pesa and aesa Multimode radars wouldnt it be possible to give out False radar Signals to confuse the enemy?
if only the Russian navy would make a Su-33SM or something with an upgraded avionics + missile set and repaint them all in the peak dark navy color
2 Likes
That’s my experience so far.
My SU30MKK can reliably track targets from 80-90km in TWS HDN mode when the game starts.
TWS mode however is less reliable than HDN mode and can go blind from time to time.
So I did some digging into Russian missiles and how the developers came to model the R-77 and the R-77-1 as well. I figured some things out but also was left with a few questions.
There is the R-27ER which is modeled as having 65km frontal aspect range in the given conditions of 10km altitude and 1,100km/h TAS co-alt and co-speed.
Chart:
Spoiler
Notice the given conditions though, 10km altitude and 1,100km/h TAS for both the shooter and target.
I plugged in the currently modeled R-77 and R-77-1 in those given conditions. The maximum range for the R-77 ended up being 80km and the maximum ranges for the R-77-1 ended up being 113km (still within the 5% range margin of 110km). This aligns with the given figures from Rosoboronexport that states 80km and 110km respectively for each missile.
Knowing that this is how they model their missiles, the R-77 and R-77-1, is there any reason to expect that they won’t model the R-37M any differently with the same method?
Rosoboronexport lists the R-37M as having up to 200km.
RVV-DB
rvv-bd appears to be a modified version of r-37, not r-37m.
here is rvv-bd
r-37m has two datalink antennas, not one.
also, considering modified r-33 with a lofting algorithm was able to reach 228km range, i doubt rvv-bd;s max range is only 200km (which looks like export modified r-37 and not r-37m)
Did you take a look at the Mig-31’s launch speed in that scenario? That’s Mach 2.2 launch speed (2,400km/h) compared to 1,100km/h TAS at 10,000m.
R-37M at Mach 2 for both launcher and target would far surpass 200km into the 300km area of course.
1 Like
fair, but i still doubt they will model r-37m off rvv-bd just cause theyre different missiles (though both were based off r-37)