but now that it’s overperforming people won’t complain lol
People literally do, in this exact thread even
Just the usual, nothing too interesting
while you are demanding more buffs for an already now extremely overperforming airframe, but at least you’re not hiding that you just want to stomp with overpowered vehicles
1 Like
I demand more buffs? Like what? One of the first reactions from me was stating that gaijin might finally nerf Flanker rate at high speeds, because it overperforms in that regard for god knows how long
The thing they just buffed?
Literally the reason why I refused to research French tech tree when Rafale was added is to not play overpowered vehicles. Even now with SM2 I mostly hunt down Rafales and other SM2s in the lobby even if it means I will get 1-2 kills per game. But keep telling yourself whatever you want.
The thing they tried to buff is incorrect low speed performance. I am not responsible for gaijin incompetence. In the end low speed performance was also buffed at least, not just already overperforming high speed turn
courtesy of ron23
shows that ingame su-30mk variants in the su-30mki configuration has incorrect irst search angles (havent made a bug report on it yet).
Also it shows su-30mk being able to supercruise lolz.
4 Likes
R27 intercourse going on under the belly
1 Like
Idk, i just Hope It gets corrected
Literally rejected the bug report tho
You know gaijin, they literally rejected R-77-1 saying it won’t change anything just to literally add them like a month or 2 later with Su-30
1 Like
Not trying to be devil’s advocate in here but ingame Rafale still underperforms at some aspects in flight performance wise.
Safe to say you know nothing about Rafale’s capabilities m8.
Anyway back to the topic, has anyone know why my client still stuck with 2.53.042 despite 43 is already published?
2 Likes
no way man ´-´
Yeah the GeneralLee one was closed maybe 2 weeks ago, dev response was that the underperformance was very small and that it didn’t need further correction.
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over-Performing Energy Retention In High-G Turn - Accepted
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over-Performing Mach 1.6 Sustained Turn Rate - Accepted
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over Performing Sustained Turn Rate - Accepted
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over-Performing In Specific Excess Power / Acceleration
Would also like to state that the “rafale is underperforming in sustained turnrate” was actually incorrect and was a false buff :)
(Community Bug Reporting System)
This is literally irrelevant when I KNOW for a fact, and those bug reports are solid proof, that it is overperforming in game
Client version doesnt matter, only server version so you can still fly the flankers and feel the buff
8 Likes
Half of them got rejected even tho site says they are accepted, only report that has been applied is the sustained turn rate which was 1 degree nerf and didnt even affected the vehicle at all.
Safe to say you still dont know what you’re talking, especially using FeetPics report which is famous known person who has personal vendetta against all eurocanards, especially against Gripen and Rafale.
Meanwhile Rafale still has wrong WnE speed while underperforming radar and MICA’s.
Next time try to find report that doesnt wrote by someone who is butthurt with european delta canards :D
1 Like
He likes the rafale he just wants it to be more accurate.
There’s a presentation that we can’t use that actually has specific numbers for sustained rate for rafale that we can’t use, and it’s overperforming
Believe it or not, YET AGAIN the gripens are massively overperforming too
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CjPzh5Jy67q2