Half of them got rejected even tho site says they are accepted, only report that has been applied is the sustained turn rate which was 1 degree nerf and didnt even affected the vehicle at all.
Safe to say you still dont know what you’re talking, especially using FeetPics report which is famous known person who has personal vendetta against all eurocanards, especially against Gripen and Rafale.
Meanwhile Rafale still has wrong WnE speed while underperforming radar and MICA’s.
Next time try to find report that doesnt wrote by someone who is butthurt with european delta canards :D
He likes the rafale he just wants it to be more accurate.
There’s a presentation that we can’t use that actually has specific numbers for sustained rate for rafale that we can’t use, and it’s overperforming
Crazy how me showing you bug reports that the rafale and gripen are overperforming suddenly turned into looking at my stats
Fully aware but to say that the rafale isn’t and actively denying it is funny when its the single plane that had a consistently over 60-66% wr for all of 2025. The only jet that even came CLOSE to it was the British Typhoon why? Because Britain basically always queues with France
There’s some arguments here about other aircraft flight model reports and etc. etc. I will say that the Rafale now has two lift reports that have not been actioned and existed longer than the Su-27’s lift report which gave it a significant boost in flight performance. But this is the Su-27 thread so to keep it on topic…
Su-30SM2 has a faster spawn speed than other top tier aircraft like F-15, EFT, Rafale, J-10C, and Gripen by nearly 300kmh. This was somewhat understandable due to its flight performance, but now that the flight performance had received buffs yesterday should the SU-30SM2 still retain its faster spawn speed?
The buffs do affect the high speed energy retention if my understanding is correct. So now the Su-30SM2 which already has a higher spawn speed can better retain it through the beginning of the matches into the middle-late parts of the matches.
This is a very odd line of attack considering I barely even touch F-15s and haven’t really touched them outside of duels for the better part of 2 years. I thought the last time that you made this line of attack was because I was a Flanker fanboy or whatever?
The “official SAAB information” that MiG_23M cited in his turn rate report is the same source that is cited in the new Gripen turn rate report.
I was one of the people who suggested that spawn speed should be the same for all vehicles (Mach 1.0), but gaijin just straight up ignored it ´-´, and to be honest, its not gonna change much, but its still a reason for people to start questioning things, like right now
The Su-30SM2 can’t generate speed like the EFT but it still maintains great energy retention at high speeds so it does matter for the Su-30SM2 especially when it is heavily loaded with many weapons.
Spawn speed is something completely arbitrary and something we could have more voice on compared to bug reports, the whole idea of air-spawns is already a mechanic that favors aircraft that carries a lot more weapons than those that choose to do with few or can’t take many since they don’t have to struggle taking off and getting up to Mach 1 in the first place.
