Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

What will sell me on this theory is premium F-15 rolling out in the first update of 2026.

1 Like

Does it look like i care about other Doritos? What we asked in the bug report completely got mishandled.

Implementation was purely comical, and i am a flanker main & only play ru. So even if it benefits, i do care about the insane over performance as much as i care about the low speed performance lift. Bug report wasnt asking for higher str.

What happened here damn

Spoiler

1 Like

but now that it’s overperforming people won’t complain lol

People literally do, in this exact thread even

Just the usual, nothing too interesting

while you are demanding more buffs for an already now extremely overperforming airframe, but at least you’re not hiding that you just want to stomp with overpowered vehicles

1 Like

I demand more buffs? Like what? One of the first reactions from me was stating that gaijin might finally nerf Flanker rate at high speeds, because it overperforms in that regard for god knows how long

The thing they just buffed?

Literally the reason why I refused to research French tech tree when Rafale was added is to not play overpowered vehicles. Even now with SM2 I mostly hunt down Rafales and other SM2s in the lobby even if it means I will get 1-2 kills per game. But keep telling yourself whatever you want.

The thing they tried to buff is incorrect low speed performance. I am not responsible for gaijin incompetence. In the end low speed performance was also buffed at least, not just already overperforming high speed turn

courtesy of ron23
shows that ingame su-30mk variants in the su-30mki configuration has incorrect irst search angles (havent made a bug report on it yet).
Also it shows su-30mk being able to supercruise lolz.

brochure


image

4 Likes

R27 intercourse going on under the belly

1 Like

Idk, i just Hope It gets corrected

Literally rejected the bug report tho

You know gaijin, they literally rejected R-77-1 saying it won’t change anything just to literally add them like a month or 2 later with Su-30

1 Like

Not trying to be devil’s advocate in here but ingame Rafale still underperforms at some aspects in flight performance wise.

Safe to say you know nothing about Rafale’s capabilities m8.

Anyway back to the topic, has anyone know why my client still stuck with 2.53.042 despite 43 is already published?

2 Likes

no way man ´-´

Yeah the GeneralLee one was closed maybe 2 weeks ago, dev response was that the underperformance was very small and that it didn’t need further correction.

Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over-Performing Energy Retention In High-G Turn - Accepted
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over-Performing Mach 1.6 Sustained Turn Rate - Accepted
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over Performing Sustained Turn Rate - Accepted
Community Bug Reporting System Rafale Over-Performing In Specific Excess Power / Acceleration

Would also like to state that the “rafale is underperforming in sustained turnrate” was actually incorrect and was a false buff :)
(Community Bug Reporting System)

This is literally irrelevant when I KNOW for a fact, and those bug reports are solid proof, that it is overperforming in game

Client version doesnt matter, only server version so you can still fly the flankers and feel the buff

8 Likes