the ols27 used on n001vep provides it, its on the webpage that i used when submitting my bug report on wrong radar for the su30mk2. up to 10 km
Spoiler
Should be universal amongst OLS IRST then. Well, Su-27SM Onwards at least
“should be”. Pretty much all IRSTs on Russian aircrafts (maybe apart MiG-23 platforms) are severely nerfed. Balance reasons or something like that iirc.
3 Likes
So, anyone checked that “engine tweak” for pretty much all flankers on dev? Any noticeable change?
Did I miss something?
What engine tweak
2 Likes
I don’t understand if this is a buff or a nerf, I can’t see a report linked to it, and I’m not on the dev currently.
I am on dev, but my monke brain works on vibes instead of hard data so i have zero clue on what this changed in Flanker behavior.
Initially it had RPM copied from mig-29 engines. They changed them to Al-31F ones.
so does it change anything? Or RPM is just an arbitrary number in-game?
I couldn’t tell the diffefence, just tested on dev.
1 Like
My monke brain was able to tell they changed the statcard image lol
The absolute refutation of this myth that Su-35’s center-line store positions are wider between the engines.
That bug report is a bug report on the thickness of the center bar, not the width of the entire dual pylon.
As you can see from the photo and screenshot, the width of the dual launcher is correct as the fins overlap perfectly, and the engine width is the same.
Su-35 and Su-30SM: Weird how the countermeasure blocks take up the same exact space between the engines. More proof there is no new space between the engines.
Su-35 and Su-27: Well this is embarrassing… it’s the same width.
No one, not a single person that has actually worked on Su-35s has spoken with me.
Not a single person has provided evidence to substantiate a claim that Su-35’s engine width is supposed to be different.
Changing the width between the engines of a jet, let alone a fighter jet is super expensive, and can mess up many things aerodynamically. Sukhoi obviously wouldn’t do that, and they didn’t.
Pixel hunters can find more images and prove the engine width is the same if they want, but this case is closed.
Stop perpetuating myths.
1 Like
you haven’t provided any evidence of the Su-27SM or Su-30SM carrying the pylon
1 Like
@Papa_Daniel
That was not the purpose of this post. Either address the post, or stop the red herring fallacy.
I have no claim for Su-27SM as is.
please submit an image of the Su-27SM or Su-30SM carrying the pylon, thank you
You can’t read?.. It says that space between launcher irl 1.3 wider than central beam.
Yes, because the in-game central beam is too wide.
The entire launcher width is correct, the central beam width is not.
If the launcher itself was wider it wouldn’t be able to fit on Su-35.
Well, this definitely warrants 16 AMRUMS to the Golden Eagle
1 Like