the 213 is time to impact, in seconds
1 Like
those articles were posted before the hud pics were released.
looks like r-27 may be overperforming heavily, will be writing a report to make it ~25 gs
@Grimtax you think the assessment is correct? I know you’ve read through this book b4, what you think?
are there any reports about the seeker?
this doc also goes over seekerhead, which I think has already been reported b4 but denied though.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IA1wypLIZtPl
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/todo3RATsYNY
1 Like
so itll stay probably overperforming?
1 Like
seekerhead? yeah. maybe not maneuverability though, as dual plane has explicitly been denied. so if i put in a report for r-27 should be limited to 25g single plane, that might go through (if im understanding it right)
1 Like
astonishing 1 of 30 hit rate but better guidance than AIM-7M
1 Like
not like the 7M had a better hit rate
there were reports of only one out of for sparrows firing on F-15s
it had a way better hit rate. order of magnitude better
30 out of 44 in gulf war
4 Likes
ah yeah 2/3 is about the same hit rate as 1/30
get your math correct 3/4 isnt 2/3
just stop talking atp, your making yourself look worse
yeah ik, thats what i mean
1 Like
to be fair it excludes another 44 recorded missile uses that were listed in logistics data but not confirmed as actual combat engagements. so its really 30/88
iam sorry that i made a mathematical mistake, that isnt even helpful for my point
maybe you should get your human decency checked
1 Like
Against what 👀
i mean afaik the r27 hit rates are for missiles launched in combat too, only fair to hold them to the same standard
1 Like
1 of 30 in Africa for the 27ER is the only one ive heard.