Rwr names alongside with all informations changed with re-name mod so I’m still getting use to what vehicle actually appears on RWR.
Its most likely TOR-M1 tho as its the closest SPAA to airfield.
1 Like
Ermm i dont think so, izd 810 has aesa seeker allowing for a much bigger motor section, i dont think r37m can fit that
Would be really nice against stealth, we know irbis e can do 70km against a 0.01m2 target irl from the mkk hud footage (advertised as 90 against 0.01), i wonder what the normal irbis range might be
I dont think there is any difference between IRBIS and IRBIS-E in terms of range.
Might be wrong tho.
Irbis e is supposed to be downgraded, especially due to the fact that they were given to china
In that case we might have actual IRBIS on SM2 considering radar capabilities match with brochure iirc and I also noticed E model actually named IRBIS with re-name mod.
radar wont pick anyone up further than 100km away
its a hard cap set by gaijin similar to the 30km IRST range cap
Radars that have over 100km range in game right now
Might be limited artificially due to not having long range weapon systems but unlike before it can actually detect targets once they remove the hard capping.
Previously even on HPRF mode you could only track enemies up to 80km.
IRSTs that have over 30km range rn
he give you position of everyone in sim mode.
Su30sm2 doesnt even have irbis irl, if gaijin is giving it n035 because mkk had it, it should be n035e
Dont tell me, tell it to Gaijin.
Irl SM2 doesn’t have AL-41F as well.
Well as of now, couple of airframes are getting modified to get them (only al41) in Akhtubinsk, even rostec said that in 2025
I find it funny eurofighters radar range against xm2 rcs is same as rafale
Surely there is no difference between 1550~ and 850~ TRMs, right gaijin?
Most likely testbeds as actually squadrons still doesnt have access to it.
I don’t think they are testbeds, but we will probably see some information closer to summer
Of course they are not dedicated test bed airframes.
What i meant is that they will most likely gonna use those airframes to test actual performance of AL-41F on 30SM’s which makes them kinda test bed in basic logic.
IIRC they already tested AL-41F-1S performance on Su-30 testbed, so there is probably no real reason to do so
Still would be good enough